IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Sun, 08 November 2020 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA863A0112 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 09:58:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QM0z0m1wMns4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 09:58:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 486E93A0114 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 09:58:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com with SMTP id y78so3660858vsy.6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 09:58:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QIrRV7pP0vqWtoKAU8m8EdbYZu5aV7Y13BKSEGmwapw=; b=JofeOwwu8mvDgRjISD4V0m9g2Yv0Cyv1Hg1N0J0lTB0m1b3Nhja4AVKhyOEFEJaLwa 1bz9kzkNmuVT2S5ODrYtqfoRLIBsVddj7PqQCFfmj7mhsYKqdzHTbpDd9YetowQBx9uC vsAsSSxK1gyKlfzXe5oSYb391KAgMZTeXbi+UbNx7a8na0292Vn4qwU4YbVeuZoQJ7fF BbneFboFmM9fTDvotiWZxl34cD3guniweGeFWiVlgEZiiO+sfwoCUofdcq0MXu89T4VU qn4qI7/6WqRGYL/Mlo7X20G8gLDt1lpTQzLyMbetvhkAcz8QEx2wn4tJ4k9TxDVOlasE Miag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QIrRV7pP0vqWtoKAU8m8EdbYZu5aV7Y13BKSEGmwapw=; b=WLEZRLubSPt//I7CjmNoUmMW/3Wn00DumtXO51YSZBx4H7IhBQvYzKWdn+lU/ZbMUk HLGoWVFJbK9k4WyEHBB2j1P1mmstvcYk7/nYAFDm6PqOP0Hz1pcSLRoDaVH/AUm87A5b 8UytzlRCz6eu71rYDmqZElkCZOjzs+0kMa0nW7eOiRSihOo5mtaXydsP3iIiGYvfVRra FY58XAXfZ/p+ao1Hk0SHrPIs7M0+UolZfMfroCCzWOMUvZcwrFgjPNn5YHkaxfP4bwks 3QZ+R3r03WTK9HgMD6Cyx6pB1X/8fJ82Z46YwlMBa8veOLemdg+A1dbFcgDb9uoHdEoZ KOLQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vTkxzMs7kpR8yYCbyuFWE6e04/f/1fOpw9ZOSVoHL9AIqfMdQ pngjQHuO9hdgVR7/BfFNhleCWvu6TuK90HetMFU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0VdhrhVpy1bo/56o7pjDSwm1Mi/yKHVjnm/32qM+R/Dpe3/zAOeoQcL0cXVMrJrRq6XZBMjif4ZIdPNoVmyE=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:741:: with SMTP id 62mr230125vsh.5.1604858298155; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 09:58:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <79251783-8235-4EE6-8659-66C8E52735A3@gmail.com> <CABNhwV2o22usnWm=jbkDZ3Gdu9vACyBPAQ1kGj+Pyaxp1Y5z=A@mail.gmail.com> <D9BADCAB-2342-4E29-9002-25842E884C77@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <D9BADCAB-2342-4E29-9002-25842E884C77@employees.org>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 12:58:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CABNhwV2g7aEC3yqE3rBS7jpp8xK6PFTRTRN_X3nTQFMk-xvPXg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109
To: otroan@employees.org
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c6c4d905b39c30ae"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/p_BF98JZ6TYjSdTYB4pbbjKWQEA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 17:58:21 -0000

On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:35 PM <otroan@employees.org> wrote:

> Hi Gyan,
>
> > As we have had thus far and ongoing quite a bit of discussion on
> variable slaac can we add this to the agenda.  We can also expand the scope
> of discussion as to all use cases related to slaac longer prefix lengths
> and how it can be beneficial per the “Extending a /64” new thread.  I can
> start the discussion and we can take it from there.
>
> The "Extending a /64" thread (which I in hindsight see is poorly named) is
> not about longer prefix lengths.
> It is about exploring solutions to the problem of extending a network
> assigned with a single /64 with multiple links.


    Gyan> Agreed but G-Extend the 64 bit boundary

>
>
> <chair-hat>Bob and I had a discussion with the chairs of v6ops, where we
> agreed to have the "what is the operational problem" discussion over in
> v6ops.</chair-hat>.


    Gyan> Sounds good.  Will have the draft authors join in on the
discussion.

>
>
> Best regards,
> Ole

-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email