Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109

[Ole Troan <[e-mail]>]

I would expect the v6ops chairs would like a presentation, but let me not presuppose how they want to run that session. 

Cheers 
Ole

> On 8 Nov 2020, at 19:00, Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:58 PM Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:35 PM <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>> Hi Gyan,
>>>> 
>>>> > As we have had thus far and ongoing quite a bit of discussion on variable slaac can we add this to the agenda.  We can also expand the scope of discussion as to all use cases related to slaac longer prefix lengths and how it can be beneficial per the “Extending a /64” new thread.  I can start the discussion and we can take it from there.
>>>> 
>>>> The "Extending a /64" thread (which I in hindsight see is poorly named) is not about longer prefix lengths.
>>>> It is about exploring solutions to the problem of extending a network assigned with a single /64 with multiple links.
>>> 
>>>     Gyan> Agreed but G-Extend the 64 bit boundary 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> <chair-hat>Bob and I had a discussion with the chairs of v6ops, where we agreed to have the "what is the operational problem" discussion over in v6ops.</chair-hat>.
>>> 
>>>     Gyan> Sounds good.  Will have the draft authors join in on the discussion.
>> 
>>     Should I put together a presentation for the discussion or will it be ad-hoc.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Ole
>> -- 
>> 
>> 
>> Gyan Mishra
>> Network Solutions Architect 
>> M 301 502-1347
>> 13101 Columbia Pike 
>> Silver Spring, MD
>> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> Gyan Mishra
> Network Solutions Architect 
> M 301 502-1347
> 13101 Columbia Pike 
> Silver Spring, MD
>