IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Sun, 08 November 2020 18:59 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DB33A083F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 10:59:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JywmMhnmWMVF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 10:59:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2b.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B7603A0829 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 10:59:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2b.google.com with SMTP id s135so1418758vkh.6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 10:59:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pOQhgx+JEpLf5DBHCbaTdEOZe674LYl2l8v3W8CoeCg=; b=c3vCNJhgDAQtxlWVGsZ3waI6cZnBQP+8hzqtIa+U3QzBVcT/em2jyrkUyGuZOt7Ven fPxty9tgu/73Vvl5H4t4CE54bXh89mWEdNtGhAJrO53PmMtlZH1fwCCdfHr9QnlQ2BtZ OL5IeePl1zvNUKUstqs8eH1KAH6NXUdRqCzjEJxasz9mTEXsp5ndoZInbbtn0LiqttUz N7RX9CZwgqh89qIpqUrdfA6VCzItBy5lzObqOT8ZbcHN8asuHAjwFTl4vb4Qcg8z1cJn 2pLAVH6/zLZCanf55LloOwC3gwRp1+CDvx76YLFKk3oXsoxIfIPRknbxPJg2aL14MCaw OwCA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pOQhgx+JEpLf5DBHCbaTdEOZe674LYl2l8v3W8CoeCg=; b=sqkb2ICkbKZTu9OTCuberk5NggGuZoJKKwoj6dVTe4H9EcNTKbntJralnXrl21yn0Y OIYwqk1JAJ4MMltxGfZxANUgvHbqaTWrjFGDIxCzXOmDwfyAHB3ByaZjNmdanCoo9z+g m0p4t0/8e+vi4TaXrqvJyrTmbUjFmpJH4hfQyn4OKypTI+e2RVYQSvW/KrC64PtnBWs9 s48D+DtFvXY/s85Aa/WOInXn4IkauEHl5ZFRfEsyv8BFDvU6J/Mod3T/Rf/ac0lXvXtD GDPx8e4Js5ypFZA/bTpGDg521wqw3cN8cgTRxC54bVv8lcH11a+9dK+phuBrSBO6WpP7 gHfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5318hSQOl/leKrD0joTkcg5Z2S0z949GFCXQDRgQkN+f/dTWC39l sSgmZdGF8fInTj38czuak4gSsbHgO4e6EE2FZ4Q=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQBUdoSQh9hkx1vRTzILeR57hLZHJC1eFoIQiHUwAsnL5KNj9AF98D5rEG/ADyPdMi97p6BPCkkcDSkRTRvzs=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:e584:: with SMTP id c126mr2456588vkh.3.1604861958150; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 10:59:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABNhwV3yxvK-ukHxe9Abaso1daVKO1qreFxiQ981=S0gBPorqA@mail.gmail.com> <1A06280C-97EE-4B0A-9E71-ACAAFEA37399@employees.org> <c90aca53-d0f7-efc9-3937-99abed392421@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c90aca53-d0f7-efc9-3937-99abed392421@gmail.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 13:59:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CABNhwV3hYoTw+arY5pnBVFb9FsNYHQfQSPYNcdxL+_hWKuc+Zw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eddc1305b39d0af9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/aPcSNIhZz4tnXr9-DCjquOKZ574>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 18:59:21 -0000

Per Ole only one presentation in v6OPS.

Gyan
On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 1:43 PM Alexandre Petrescu <
alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> So we end up with two presentations in two WGs about the same problem?
>
> Alex
>
> Le 08/11/2020 à 19:16, Ole Troan a écrit :
> > I would expect the v6ops chairs would like a presentation, but let me
> > not presuppose how they want to run that session.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ole
> >
> >> On 8 Nov 2020, at 19:00, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> 
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:58 PM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com
> >> <mailto:hayabusagsm@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:35 PM <otroan@employees.org
> >>     <mailto:otroan@employees.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >>         Hi Gyan,
> >>
> >>         > As we have had thus far and ongoing quite a bit of
> >>         discussion on variable slaac can we add this to the agenda.
> >>         We can also expand the scope of discussion as to all use cases
> >>         related to slaac longer prefix lengths and how it can be
> >>         beneficial per the “Extending a /64” new thread.  I can start
> >>         the discussion and we can take it from there.
> >>
> >>         The "Extending a /64" thread (which I in hindsight see is
> >>         poorly named) is not about longer prefix lengths.
> >>         It is about exploring solutions to the problem of extending a
> >>         network assigned with a single /64 with multiple links.
> >>
> >>
> >>         Gyan> Agreed but G-Extend the 64 bit boundary
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>         <chair-hat>Bob and I had a discussion with the chairs of
> >>         v6ops, where we agreed to have the "what is the operational
> >>         problem" discussion over in v6ops.</chair-hat>.
> >>
> >>
> >>         Gyan> Sounds good.  Will have the draft authors join in on the
> >>     discussion.
> >>
> >>
> >>     Should I put together a presentati
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/%C2%A0+Should+I+put+together+a+presentati?entry=gmail&source=g>on
> for the discussion or will it
> >> be ad-hoc.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>         Best regards,
> >>         Ole
> >>
> >>     --
> >>
> >>     <http://www.verizon.com/>
> >>
> >>     *Gyan Mishra*
> >>
> >>     /Network Solutions A//rchitect /
> >>
> >>     /M 301 502-1347
> >>     13101 Columbia Pike
> >>     /Silver Spring, MD
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> <http://www.verizon.com/>
> >>
> >> *Gyan Mishra*
> >>
> >> /Network Solutions A//rchitect /
> >>
> >> /M 301 502-1347
> >> 13101 Columbia Pike
> >> /Silver Spring, MD
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> > ipv6@ietf.org
> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email