IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: SLAAC, Static & DHCPv6 day 1 interoperability issue

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 10 November 2020 00:42 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81023A10DE; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 16:42:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GLFxEeytIb5C; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 16:42:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x530.google.com (mail-pg1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A47223A10DF; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 16:42:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x530.google.com with SMTP id r10so8604646pgb.10; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 16:42:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3YKs7hISXotErqnWQh+1eP0Gmd96SwdIkShNEU+2TI0=; b=KKyxNUzKtTdEDfGW40fSUpEz4oAur07IoKZnKfRxB1v6e47fP/pjymj1SLon6TVlr+ /aBkgNoJpgmzKFkuO0hBdoV33iE74k+SF9g5OqcrhkOqb0j3lZbkQHDcGfrBu9LZ874r p3ux5BGLn9sBGd71W6OICGwXb5JYay5D1Q+xsmOnY2+Nd0bi2Urhgcd6aAJT4URbmRG1 wf7vgXI5cs+QgmVntuwNvW71BBivyWY45mjEZEBatEjqa8E8hzNX95AnuTYcdahWZ6JK 3wwRus+HqeWqUHrIZvQeLX21/uX9ongT+pbOWzk8Yn7/qrEVHuItdvVQ8D8+VxHxx/Pp yo3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3YKs7hISXotErqnWQh+1eP0Gmd96SwdIkShNEU+2TI0=; b=iA5YW72DB0baQn0UqwiTvRf7b3lPQUmRWsF0+b0uJR20WltB+8PUlRxpkRyz+eKyK4 nikVxs5yoXoV57RTY/xwpsaDeHTdBGmrep91qe0QHB5u4+DjBGtl0mbgx7zG5EIl/vaR P18cb7EJmlpBTc0kpzPQaie/mjFSpQjd1pWunfcaWs9usJCf7ncNfr4ehafkfQmc6bqJ Fs3Mzd0CmGEiudQNw/VbRZlLnYpks268JPbjvOoFOi/2zYkuhnyrrTiVeH8eBzvwMyuf 6njrg2nmztL80haQMe73gRqefdT40hBWb/tP8M1UulgxWrvVAC77lFayn658G6tTV013 WI7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KIXenrpprnT6fueleaLD3lgKk38xrVNHXjYSpGhx6e1cWF0SJ EVjrtU02dqVVsw9cykDoTHc2Ymj1EBAyeA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx0qGKW8U1vpSt4KDCK7r25wQ9JlxLK4mBYFh57lZCEb7jBjBE9fb48sYHImBEhRrgXCPEkDQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:ac09:0:b029:18b:b0f1:74d7 with SMTP id v9-20020a62ac090000b029018bb0f174d7mr16279882pfe.47.1604968932710; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 16:42:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([151.210.130.0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w70sm10722218pfc.11.2020.11.09.16.42.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Nov 2020 16:42:11 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: SLAAC, Static & DHCPv6 day 1 interoperability issue
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, Dmytro Shytyi <dmytro@shytyi.net>, Dusan Mudric <dusan.mudric@gmail.com>, IPv6 IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, "draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac@ietf.org" <draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac@ietf.org>
References: <CABNhwV1D7ng8JHJVUBrMhVmbQEQrhECBN_XUUcS5ZSV0WF=Lnw@mail.gmail.com> <4658abe3-909e-af0a-ddad-85db06e161ff@gmail.com> <CABNhwV1rBhWF6e7Tuk6L-R=gTmWgfXvFkWkCQyvbmEA06W3t0A@mail.gmail.com> <4088150e-1289-5c4f-184d-30df3e66f354@gmail.com> <CABNhwV2DQ_N8b8RsRAd0Bcd5v7qXV9Dq3p+BheQVxFz+zar-BQ@mail.gmail.com> <99059E36-BE6B-4DB1-AE9E-176154A0F730@isc.org> <CABNhwV0t=GQ3mdXV7pKnEmeEsBC2SbLTVrk+tPu6agz=7YbamA@mail.gmail.com> <3AEF7767-5A03-4172-91F9-69645DF2670B@isc.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <467dd987-e599-a9c6-9d26-ac2f7155fec7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 13:42:06 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3AEF7767-5A03-4172-91F9-69645DF2670B@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/09BOVmdord2OfoEmGGqFrxivkXQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 00:42:15 -0000

On 10-Nov-20 12:25, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Just because there where lots of people with IPv4 think in the operator community that
> pushed back because “We think we know best” doesn’t mean the original decision was wrong.
> 
> If you look at those communities more and more are coming to the understanding that /48
> was a good decision.

I think it took a surprisingly long time for people to understand that the 35 trillion /48s in 2000::/3 is a really big number.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email