IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: SLAAC, Static & DHCPv6 day 1 interoperability issue

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Tue, 10 November 2020 01:05 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706933A154D; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:05:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.683
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.683 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id puU9rS5pOh7M; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:05:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x931.google.com (mail-ua1-x931.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::931]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF1FE3A1565; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:05:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x931.google.com with SMTP id v16so3425686uat.9; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:05:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=W4csvYTtLMaMaMSP7kAm/kvE+f5ri+wAQCHpTSVzPqI=; b=XD4/MUO50YcWOGcP2xR8/J/hWDVlf9bINjygsoHBXp8xSmJuPd5tfNJmSF7KWhk11v XdgxOBdeEFQnnX9a2FSANLeXVQC3B9ofm7DHvTbsLy9V66oSh60SM52FVPWK7SppCQvR N7CO3V1ZkswMlbCD5GnxUoFokhdI6tYDAmrZl8JTci0lpYELLnb1IPoFJ10UF7RR/gGl daJL4g1OLaMRjKEB2w/3LMi7Vcl4eSpnmjGAbRItwSBQlZbUGk+dSDxIdtnko9VrLVnF BV+Oop5DblCpyACUohp/TvBgxYB/Y7lWMuPCW5q89nSVuZ/LQoxZoW+G1LVFzsGcEqyF li1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=W4csvYTtLMaMaMSP7kAm/kvE+f5ri+wAQCHpTSVzPqI=; b=kZK26Y6MgtnHOPopLXEKz9UmIQT9oPX2oBtal/ELWMew9G4Ls51Nf1fM9/vCZqlmPo MvUZqaOnoWoJH/W5VjSXaQo9rWb90+V4Jr63E7W41DRetxZFRHouojbzBaI+qj0yb77i F6GevUL6bWk43u2/I4KdsXeFZqmxRzQzIY08ookzSyNHGA+CXgCbPDeXSHyHj1YX5jj9 DiHCUPBYJorLkjufriH4COqgY3YPnZcwg08WBAKlTQ71CbsMOBwfoWStZTBslVokHaqs Kfj/U6gpBEjEnVR8mSgJdx3c2tzRkgmwiCQ7ZuqbjfL+Xk+n+1phmgwFlUqKH1HU4Jb8 l+/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ABG/HvntCcSq4TY3T0IwcfHwhZZhFq93nmw5HDMrO+3pWIjvM BhNkDhjytHc5ObcAwXarOcr7355g0GdtCsRrixc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQ01+HH1JeobIEJ4SbpBuG19CXxtNGatF96XjA8rActaB4/0Yd38MaktK/lzKwHAXec/4xv8NoqVYiETGP8Eo=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:64cf:: with SMTP id j15mr8521544uaq.106.1604970318810; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:05:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABNhwV1D7ng8JHJVUBrMhVmbQEQrhECBN_XUUcS5ZSV0WF=Lnw@mail.gmail.com> <4658abe3-909e-af0a-ddad-85db06e161ff@gmail.com> <CABNhwV1rBhWF6e7Tuk6L-R=gTmWgfXvFkWkCQyvbmEA06W3t0A@mail.gmail.com> <4088150e-1289-5c4f-184d-30df3e66f354@gmail.com> <CABNhwV2DQ_N8b8RsRAd0Bcd5v7qXV9Dq3p+BheQVxFz+zar-BQ@mail.gmail.com> <99059E36-BE6B-4DB1-AE9E-176154A0F730@isc.org> <CABNhwV0t=GQ3mdXV7pKnEmeEsBC2SbLTVrk+tPu6agz=7YbamA@mail.gmail.com> <3AEF7767-5A03-4172-91F9-69645DF2670B@isc.org> <467dd987-e599-a9c6-9d26-ac2f7155fec7@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <467dd987-e599-a9c6-9d26-ac2f7155fec7@gmail.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 20:05:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CABNhwV2TzoYB=Jhr35NDypYkVUd_t1HFX=U+M_Z7KXJJ_wteJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SLAAC, Static & DHCPv6 day 1 interoperability issue
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, Dmytro Shytyi <dmytro@shytyi.net>, Dusan Mudric <dusan.mudric@gmail.com>, IPv6 IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, "draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac@ietf.org" <draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ba547b05b3b64518"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/zFaZZoat28tYk8MQ45P3l8umhD4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:05:22 -0000

On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 7:42 PM Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 10-Nov-20 12:25, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > Just because there where lots of people with IPv4 think in the operator
> community that
> > pushed back because “We think we know best” doesn’t mean the original
> decision was wrong.
> >
> > If you look at those communities more and more are coming to the
> understanding that /48
> > was a good decision.
>
> I think it took a surprisingly long time for people to understand that the
> 35 trillion /48s in 2000::/3 is a really big number.


  I agree 35 trillion is hard to comprehend and on top of that all the IANA
unallocated ranges which includes a bunch of /3.  In theory that all sounds
great.  One factor that does play into that is the two layers of
allocations framework IANA to RIR and then RIR allocation to service
providers which is large but not as large as you would expect given the 35
trillion.  RIR is still stingy old school on its allocations.


>
>     Brian
>
> --

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email