IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NAT64 in RA, draft-ietf-6man-ra-pref64

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 27 June 2019 13:56 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CDB12008D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 06:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jtbEuoYIu9Vi for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 06:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E89F21200B1 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 06:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A861238183; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:54:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 7CF9EDC9; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:56:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B65ACAD; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:56:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
cc: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, 6man@ietf.org, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Subject: Re: NAT64 in RA, draft-ietf-6man-ra-pref64
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BASfJ4YS6xBzK8hNJRSMnFZmdn3VE5A=sPCC3JqRa8SQEQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <12187.1558972629@localhost> <D3C7EB41-02E8-48D6-9335-26A041FD64C2@isc.org> <00C00FE5-C7CD-4B99-A2C9-CCBFCB1E4850@isc.org> <CAFU7BASfJ4YS6xBzK8hNJRSMnFZmdn3VE5A=sPCC3JqRa8SQEQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:56:39 -0400
Message-ID: <6979.1561643799@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/4GfENqfc4eLlp6Tyf_rUCY4EXDQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:56:44 -0000

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> wrote:
    > 2) the state machine is unclear to me:
    > - does the presence of the APL part mean that now the host MUST use
    > the DNS servers provided by the network to resolve the APL (remember,
    > one of the benefit of providing pref64 is ability to remove
    > dependencies on DNS64)? What if the host has DNS servers configured
    > manually? How could the client tell the difference?

Or if the device wants to use DoH (or has VPNs, or...)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email