IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NAT64 in RA, draft-ietf-6man-ra-pref64

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 28 June 2019 21:54 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246E2120105 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vqyKnK-OUsdB for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15FF11201A8 for <6man@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB2238183; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 17:52:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A6060; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 17:54:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
cc: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, 6man@ietf.org
Subject: Re: NAT64 in RA, draft-ietf-6man-ra-pref64
In-Reply-To: <7F90899E-71DF-46BB-A2AB-CE0E8274C585@isc.org>
References: <12187.1558972629@localhost> <D3C7EB41-02E8-48D6-9335-26A041FD64C2@isc.org> <00C00FE5-C7CD-4B99-A2C9-CCBFCB1E4850@isc.org> <CAFU7BASfJ4YS6xBzK8hNJRSMnFZmdn3VE5A=sPCC3JqRa8SQEQ@mail.gmail.com> <EC63A89D-26CD-4093-8814-4461B6D3D327@isc.org> <CAFU7BASsAwitEc==Zj6qT4izy-tFosg23DHXFVVzOixidEfMFA@mail.gmail.com> <6EC0FA5C-9B87-46A5-BD2D-93E2E2C85291@isc.org> <4632.1561748149@localhost> <7F90899E-71DF-46BB-A2AB-CE0E8274C585@isc.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 17:54:35 -0400
Message-ID: <25567.1561758875@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/YS29oPM-Z-DXsWhCT9NFio2KX3A>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 21:54:40 -0000

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
    > Except it DOES NOT depend on search lists. The name is absolute. I was
    > pointing out to Jen why depending on a search list was a bad idea.

To clarify, I think there are two ideas:

1) reserving _dns64, + search list to get APL
2) sending the absolute name to get APL.

I understand you are proposing (2), and I'm thanking you for clarifying that.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email