IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Wed, 15 November 2017 03:09 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC551129496 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:09:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id heUMkCoEfqN0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:09:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5C96128959 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:09:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D94B3ACCF1; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:08:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6969C160067; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:08:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576FC16007A; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:08:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id vqul8q594j81; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:08:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.30.42.89] (c27-253-115-14.carlnfd2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [27.253.115.14]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89F8B160067; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:08:22 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <D631CE54.8C0F5%lee@asgard.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 14:08:20 +1100
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, ipv6@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F6B4B156-A7C8-495F-B816-AD5C32009015@isc.org>
References: <f9805855-68cf-a3e8-a13f-c6ac31b09058@gmail.com> <bbd4e1d2-047f-6758-76f8-fd591c51dad7@gmail.com> <D631CE54.8C0F5%lee@asgard.org>
To: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/4TaTwKVdttu0Jw4riB3R1Pwv-kQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:09:26 -0000

> On 15 Nov 2017, at 1:59 pm, Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org> wrote:
> 
> On 11/15/17, 10:44 AM, "ipv6 on behalf of Brian E Carpenter"
> <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 15/11/2017 15:13, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>>> There is much IPv4 traffic on the "ietf-v6ONLY" ESSID.
>> 
>> Also on the DNS64 network. But it is all one-way, you
>> will notice. No replies as far as I can see. Most of them
>> are sourced from 169.254.*.*, but there are some oddities such as
>> 31.130.227.98	224.0.0.1	IGMPv2	42	Membership Query, general
> 
> 
> Does that return us to the question of how to tell hosts that IPv4 doesn’t
> live here, and to stop trying?
> 
> Lee

I don’t think so.  Enterprises that want to get rid of local IPv4 traffic can filter it.
In the home it really doesn’t matter if there is still local IPv4 the same way as
on most hotel nets there is a lot of IPv6 local traffic but no external IPv6 traffic.

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email