Re: Next steps for rfc6874bis

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 12 August 2021 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CC33A003E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YZVdNOZhUrL9 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com (mail-pl1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 859A53A005E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id e15so9104732plh.8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y7bkj7m41DqNG8WwWvbBJBYBBeUW+T4H6kD1aKjqzEQ=; b=oXvllChEs1olEXsxc6G7D+gSUQ2Z/akqxSiO3mhkUgww2UDn8yiCJVGISL9RVaHrUm h9T8wBLRCdmiCzBEI8hr4ZujXijFLszGhVoAtwCUiicLAcM6SoYtKuMIhZZ2a9HGmk84 R6P/Geot6Wxu1zDG8mOQK2xmQRcampQqjwwsFT+Tbc1Ky+w8qCGS4V99jPSO2Osc3CFt vcbBESvDYcVwSVitJmQo6ovSQVh5zDgo9rVWifGQEAwwF93+Su5Ql5U9QMxeFDMqAgP/ ul3aVWiAXr6NwERsGZYhCS71i9i/y7LHC5hWW1uyrZq8PmJ8RCgM288Il/0JgKKQDWVF Mo1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y7bkj7m41DqNG8WwWvbBJBYBBeUW+T4H6kD1aKjqzEQ=; b=Rq3RCM/Kxhc9dyz+Mrn9s5aMW37hzvPn2MKOR09K9mRHP8TfKKSrzhMCc53Z84VnjR z8Z388MfdARDyE5db0Y5E6jQVVdzOJCFks0W7jQxqErk7LxnaE32IoKF/sBwPjxl/0ax fqYM6FsufdIAkUXQbOHr+66YkkxgaNS40LEzKM3OEBO27aMxseBwiHHy1bjawmQfvy1K cao4zYs3HXFrLqsnsTK2vLlwrQXLSvs+UnGeorNyAH6u8OnxhFrKoXrAPZ2Mpw47IV2e kU2+OEGQHxk0SBAytaleNioqxVd0u6vUFdvxoaJinpOGXXMJaiY2Tl/wEGluA/4noyJq GCFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533sDOGHBzKnBeie/pm2KTwR9GuJNRc4yFzkoyxFj3tYXTx61t+y gYT+lC/zzjWuShekuBFpfAlx1CcTGDCHEg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPC01kKtapQxfirdNPlpe314qlZGuyPWhNi5R/q/CP1M6hMgxhkK4OnUk0jdSeBn4cP+q4Bw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:c113:: with SMTP id w19mr5705451pgf.168.1628804096423; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1188:5b01:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1188:5b01:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i8sm4516578pfo.117.2021.08.12.14.34.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Next steps for rfc6874bis
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <667b9ebb-3c99-8c5b-fa57-796e5bb84b4c@gmail.com> <3269d750-2e97-9bb2-550a-94b652d689a4@foobar.org> <1ea4c0e5-fd7c-c39a-28a6-681f6c40af8c@gmail.com> <27470.1628692112@localhost> <406d13b3-4b30-1a1a-5cd7-27a36157a3ea@gmail.com> <136ffa06-9f35-37ca-bab6-13e21ec4e75e@foobar.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <31485e6f-6d59-c0d3-b1b7-c27ec677bf2c@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:34:51 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <136ffa06-9f35-37ca-bab6-13e21ec4e75e@foobar.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/8weE00L7RckTxnVIVUaQGfXTFlE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:35:02 -0000

On 12-Aug-21 22:30, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Brian E Carpenter wrote on 12/08/2021 03:19:
>> OK, but maybe we should update the draft to state that clearly as an
>> open issue.
> 
> well, is there a reasonable chance that this can be dealt with in 
> future?  If not, then the most realistic option is to mark it as CANTFIX 
> and move on.  Maybe in this case, the draft could note that there's an 
> issue but no real hope of resolution?

We don't know yet. We'll start the discussion with browserland.

   Brian