Re: Next steps for rfc6874bis

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 16 August 2021 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008483A108E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 13:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FtWZeIO0gM1C for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 13:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com (mail-pj1-x1033.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4B933A108B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 13:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id cp15-20020a17090afb8fb029017891959dcbso875228pjb.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 13:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hMmA3KVwO+9dTU2gxlbVseT6WP5TWvpfirvYfXBRjks=; b=BgfLIyI6/DJhIIROBnb45Z3U4lzp/jUOvLqTk7/TmQMVNDfKhQdTUZ7zzdqWs7HF3J wr0JXKqLStvIwMjlBZh9kP/v6XZ57LqYskqtM9jmxQJEAxqODP0fJId0QXgoPj9AAFo8 BzTeKXRK7EAisPyZgCiPIgKrrcKlHJpNyGZ1H45ZCnhUEznt8rcvlrOck880cxYRjqWT odUvVU16C3gC+9j7JfGfSmG6Nw98dlvjirnzbuAWkXKd/wZ6DSfsWkMsc0x5AeJ6iflM MI9T5gC7+gGShRqk9LEAQllLJ2iDSAOYf5iLo2g0EZzeBJtfjPALB5QhdbhfhBZqc+au 7+Ew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hMmA3KVwO+9dTU2gxlbVseT6WP5TWvpfirvYfXBRjks=; b=B7txhG20RANTKQPRax5m6xniQPPEF3VzupmpHcch/x86fp5sZetcHyHA6GY1ry/X4E QxNoSPLiEbUPJH1vrjtvS60Dg2eb6t3JAE9z5mcPFIGMlL19G8T9rYzrX3yby51245Gt j97QCx4z+apl9Pe5Q3/L321wHRR4IoMtUU4R5E6Ty92JedoTSOjnKTlEYxV3SDu+1O8n l0WtXthUIyXUD9ZSpfvFsFPlRbd7RsIBFyqVZNEgbJsf/A3S3rlr+iWoeMiLIUXb/QpT gziRldUGNEQbXnZy0yldb6GMIBo/ZCuncaZFevEoNuyeJdsFP1R1qiV/b8fCl++dkGyZ IsZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530MRZPWJz3UMpbV6XI7q6mBBpZsM8sUo0O8LKkX8tcdgC+AI39S KTSYuBhtqpOh3Zka0t6Es+bwChl6M3M17Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1UZAn8GDeuWFQoDg624vyNdVSAaZeiMN1ie9wKmOuoUk/zQnAv6aZInVLsQcXY7tIdZMzTQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:6c5:: with SMTP id 188mr636041pgg.39.1629146768565; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 13:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1188:5b01:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1188:5b01:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h13sm37705pgh.93.2021.08.16.13.46.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Aug 2021 13:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Next steps for rfc6874bis
To: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-7@u-1.phicoh.com>, ipv6@ietf.org
References: <667b9ebb-3c99-8c5b-fa57-796e5bb84b4c@gmail.com> <3269d750-2e97-9bb2-550a-94b652d689a4@foobar.org> <1ea4c0e5-fd7c-c39a-28a6-681f6c40af8c@gmail.com> <27470.1628692112@localhost> <m1mFccG-0000I3C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20210816134703.meb4pfloazkco22n@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <m1mFdCV-0000HvC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <e1dd5e83-31d2-8b8b-2608-309f8d8d9cd0@foobar.org> <m1mFfMh-0000JWC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <29350bb2-a132-2196-c68e-e8d3614ecff8@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 08:46:03 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m1mFfMh-0000JWC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/vwbn2TM3f-1nAkJls8Uaqr7EQP4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 20:46:14 -0000

On 17-Aug-21 04:21, Philip Homburg wrote:
> In your letter dated Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:13:10 +0100 you wrote:
>> Given the IETF's general reluctance to deprecate standards, the most 
>> likely outcome of this suggestion would be that both "%" and "-" would 
>> need to be supported indefinitely.  This would be a regression.
> 
> I disagree. Yes, mistakes result in cruft. But that is not a good reason
> to continue with the mistake.

It isn't even obvious that this was a mistake. If you accept Andrew
Cady's argument, it was not a mistake at all. (The mistake was in
assuming that percent-encoding of "%" is required, by Andrew's
argument.) As Bob says, we need to hear from the browser people.
The next version of the draft will set this out as an open issue.

    Brian