IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-00.txt

Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org> Wed, 07 March 2012 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <kerlyn2001@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADA121E80B6 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:03:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_37=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JiF4avN0mqHS for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:03:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AAAF21E80B2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:03:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by eeke51 with SMTP id e51so2403265eek.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 09:03:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OBVW+ElRUndT67rfUgsqgHf1G6y9wg2lloc9cAlZBHI=; b=yP3aOfKzuzODBX+LCTNUQwrQ6Fa88SYhWkZtmYki9HONrQmL7gfMCgTSyJzpYnjwS6 JB2Tq+8QuLD9wjD6r1tzgAVcACipJuklFr+wGFMDmjGyP4e0qm/OkM5F1fpmHrfhFJyi wVKOitZMczafjjaorVQzUwBD63Btkh/EvtdF08uFLGbIAmFzYRJwd+3R6ogmETsP0hKb IbJd3opZjHVO0P0yAZqITwTJPNE2rWTeDIeTY6ivAXAZGnTTCkMGaEdqok6mJdgNNP02 hyBkeECfa2I1HX30aTKMasgLi5FclihSW1D1jymXrxlDlmtrtAeY+e0BIKZlsvO38jFF LqsA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.102.68 with SMTP id fm4mr1022738lbb.7.1331139824481; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 09:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Sender: kerlyn2001@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.86.196 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:03:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D5201250-BBB7-4383-A010-BB07E8C3B739@tzi.org>
References: <4F552A91.706@innovationslab.net> <491511B4-6EF7-4052-9A54-9C5A7DF5CC5C@tzi.org> <4F554595.7040801@gmail.com> <BFDF1F35-D80D-45CC-9A86-B28751AF85AD@tzi.org> <4F55572F.50806@gmail.com> <CAATsVbYj1TMyStivSYxMJvUWg_62Gm+zLnfKF5_MM9CbR=8TPQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F568AD6.6070602@gmail.com> <0C883703-1F07-495D-A043-602AA9E83405@tzi.org> <4F569353.3010603@gmail.com> <CAATsVba4=rMT31O=dc0PkwzteqvekugHE1QvfNez6vCAHMjuOA@mail.gmail.com> <7B0FFBFF-6660-4D32-9C27-1CDF35139FE0@tzi.org> <CABOxzu1woYfcxavu+SX=DT+HX9ZVe8A21V5vbLiXq5b2Kb69KQ@mail.gmail.com> <D5201250-BBB7-4383-A010-BB07E8C3B739@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 09:03:44 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: cyV2vEE1nY6a0QWKidOa8AnP_pQ
Message-ID: <CABOxzu1CJGcDLHh=vgYoYmEct_+SSR0grT4dT25dN2mku+=boA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-00.txt
From: Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:03:46 -0000

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2012, at 16:29, Kerry Lynn wrote:
>
>> And hopefully coap://[v6.fdfd::1]/... would work as well?
>
> Oh.  That may be a reason to go with v1, not v6...
>
> I don't think the idea is to *replace* IPv6address with IPvFuture.
> So I was thinking that this version of IPvFuture would be specifically done for the zone_id case.
> So the v6 (or v1) serves as a kind of advance warning "there will be a zone_id later).
>
As an implementor, I'd prefer a solution that works for all legal IPv6
addresses going forward.  It's not outside the realm of possibility that
these URIs may be constructed by constrained devices with multiple
interfaces (maybe that begins to test the definition of "constrained")
and I'd prefer not to have to special case link-local addresses.

My $0.02, -K-


> Grüße, Carsten
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email