IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-00.txt

Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org> Wed, 07 March 2012 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <kerlyn2001@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFCB21F878E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 07:29:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D3NaerzQ5FaC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 07:29:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCDC21F872F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 07:29:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by eeke51 with SMTP id e51so2349776eek.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:29:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=A+4QW/FBsNjqezHqZBUSguuxBKeb4VkPm4gJhqsCC54=; b=FWOJd8U5Ct4Wh7H8RmiiDZBBZVlOh1CAPsja4N/1Fm+IgDjfPnChbJ7cfGTVJRblwP 0TmxYtO4sKiIR6KBLnSMNBD6nbik2RoPtJEQFC17qMO60hapzVqJw8Gsw48n8Tuez8sp rgZfNHKh6Ey8PM4tMXLcu7M5d/6S/6t5sl3eMFSnJ8JquY9WwR5KoGVDhYTuyrGI3wpu GS5i4YwXkt8wTikjXzraFYu0Blg2HBvE3xWT2vgFQeQb55Uw3eafbk4DyDwRWpr2I43d hU9fOPQ+FHl6l5wydw/d+ujYNrt7H3iCbkYFoyuJeySI4yrKnS7SxTtY+a+2N56Rx/tK YT7w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.102.68 with SMTP id fm4mr896797lbb.7.1331134149690; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:29:09 -0800 (PST)
Sender: kerlyn2001@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.86.196 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 07:29:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7B0FFBFF-6660-4D32-9C27-1CDF35139FE0@tzi.org>
References: <4F552A91.706@innovationslab.net> <491511B4-6EF7-4052-9A54-9C5A7DF5CC5C@tzi.org> <4F554595.7040801@gmail.com> <BFDF1F35-D80D-45CC-9A86-B28751AF85AD@tzi.org> <4F55572F.50806@gmail.com> <CAATsVbYj1TMyStivSYxMJvUWg_62Gm+zLnfKF5_MM9CbR=8TPQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F568AD6.6070602@gmail.com> <0C883703-1F07-495D-A043-602AA9E83405@tzi.org> <4F569353.3010603@gmail.com> <CAATsVba4=rMT31O=dc0PkwzteqvekugHE1QvfNez6vCAHMjuOA@mail.gmail.com> <7B0FFBFF-6660-4D32-9C27-1CDF35139FE0@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:29:09 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ouWcHU-vh0PnGbFXSOTS-YeCQVg
Message-ID: <CABOxzu1woYfcxavu+SX=DT+HX9ZVe8A21V5vbLiXq5b2Kb69KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-00.txt
From: Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:29:11 -0000

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2012, at 15:22, Bill Fenner wrote:
>
>>> RFC 3986 is not sacred.
>>
>> Of course it's not sacred.
>
> Not sacred, but is is also not open for gratuitous changes.
>
> I don't see a technical reason to do anything else than what you proposed (i.e., not to stay within the confines of the standard).
>
Apparently this is why we all still use QWERTY keyboards :-)

> To make this all more concrete: The address:
>
>        fe80::1%en1
>
> becomes part of a URI like this:
>
>        coap://[v6.fe80::1_en1]/...
>
And hopefully coap://[v6.fdfd::1]/... would work as well?

> which is really easy to explain and document.
>
> Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email