Re: [EXTERNAL] 64bit MAC addresses and SLAAC

otroan@employees.org Wed, 17 June 2020 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27363A0A80 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P33Oh6cXtX6K for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 457013A0A7E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from astfgl.hanazo.no (76.84-234-131.customer.lyse.net [84.234.131.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 790984E11AEC; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:35:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by astfgl.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E483E3713A92; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:35:46 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] 64bit MAC addresses and SLAAC
From: otroan@employees.org
In-Reply-To: <79d494caa7874696b787aadb80cc322b@boeing.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:35:46 +0200
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D0759F97-4504-4B90-905E-D055B17B2663@employees.org>
References: <e8a25961-5ac9-d35e-77dd-bf86f45cd077@gmail.com> <a17ae9f3-001c-07f6-84f9-a0ca583e6a00@gmail.com> <7AE5B6D0-AB01-4077-A9EF-5BD86F428681@gmail.com> <7a3b839f-099e-8fd3-35a2-4625df3c369e@gmail.com> <76e8bd7a-4333-480f-de0f-dcc775418739@si6networks.com> <79d494caa7874696b787aadb80cc322b@boeing.com>
To: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/JJsMqi9i_Mf_bn5imDCSvQ74F2M>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:35:53 -0000

Fred,

> Fernando, I think an unspoken assumption in these past several messages is that
> privacy is ALWAYS a required property. However, there are cases where address
> privacy is not only not required, but it is also desirable and useful to be able to
> track a node by a stable and unchanging IP address or prefix.
> 
> This is not intended to challenge the non-use of MAC addresses in Interface
> Identifiers per your documents, but just to say that in some environments the
> randomization and constant changing of IP addresses may actual run counter to
> operational objectives.

Implementations and operational deployments or other link-types are of course free to choose whatever recommendation (or none) for default IID generation.
IID mechanisms are not protocol specifications. They are recommendations taking various parameters into account (stability, tracking etc).
These are not required for interoperability.
Configure IIDs manually if you like.

Cheers,
Ole