Re: Linux & draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues

Dan Lüdtke <mail@danrl.de> Wed, 25 March 2015 11:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mail@danrl.de>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57101AC3D0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 04:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NJThKzaSUkl4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 04:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.sealand.io (mx.sealand.io [IPv6:2001:67c:26f4:64::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26F251A8AD7 for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 04:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:70a7:10:3ca9:c422:5218:dac2] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:70a7:10:3ca9:c422:5218:dac2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.sealand.io (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79B0E60C03; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:13:15 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Linux & draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_990640BF-B877-4A4B-8349-B4DF493AC237"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6
From: Dan Lüdtke <mail@danrl.de>
In-Reply-To: <D118FE45-676C-4BAC-91D3-34A0224F7432@employees.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:13:13 +0100
Message-Id: <8E48D338-1B3F-4559-B5B1-12832A314F5A@danrl.de>
References: <55102C6B.1060608@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr2XfeSuQAj94kN1AF_8cet2L+uEkJnO59NyYgtwyfXu7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3YBdjSkwgoAzTXs_dvoiRnSFReE5-fAO7RggvVLwDthw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFU7BASXNe6TXWt7R2+tBjiob8n23VpBV5THV5hJxSHV-wKo5A@mail.gmail.com> <55118F3B.3000308@si6networks.com> <CAFU7BAQX95WmBu1r=yp38pZ3tEBrxdEX32cvHE7A8AkLjESSEA@mail.gmail.com> <5511EF4C.1050908@si6networks.com> <D118FE45-676C-4BAC-91D3-34A0224F7432@employees.org>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/JVyP8Gj-ZNss-p_bJaV3sjBucYw>
Cc: draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues@tools.ietf.org, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:13:18 -0000

> with e.g. “the value of the Lifetime SHOULD be bounded by Router Lifetime”.

I think it is in general a good idea to upper limit lifetimes of entities announced in a RA by the lifetime of that RA, given the maximum lifetime of RA is proposed to be changed to 65535 as proposed in draft-krishnan-6man-maxra-01.


Cheers

Dan