IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Linux & draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Wed, 25 March 2015 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798581B2AC4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o83ajo1dGlD0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0FE41B2B02 for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibbg6 with SMTP id bg6so36164555wib.0 for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cwfi191x2f96KEgOvyBF8tw9GMRW7c18CZhHxndoLBQ=; b=w3zH3cpN6gzorvrCiwO45E/lgYVMkJjVc46K6UqrfNpy+D7/8tb9minpaClY2CpzyL Rt2sG9wGgHmnTlcxTMA+IcbXyb+Ctkarh3Lsjf3Xo/VYFm9oyGvEzEfy6FxhVIdFBcsO 6v3vaCYydYbpC1oGd+HEzj0zLPVHGqVW/it/lMnRR+zDifWKViaiuWk1tFHHkc1Mbrdd ENlnIvNtVYbvnJO/ZIx+s/P75RT+a6t4cvA6mMQonuGvZd78SQ+uyuhYB7PsCUMmclJO c6nmvfJIPWfG4ME5ZO2+ID05hgOb7/FVhmmAhir8849Xj4Nb9ykDM0ST79TsUCADoayl Wjkg==
X-Received: by 10.180.80.164 with SMTP id s4mr32378657wix.78.1427309090589; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.58.76 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BAREa8Ju2h3HF+J6Zfq0q9swB-bqHOWyqhMasnQ0u6Z47w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <55102C6B.1060608@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr2XfeSuQAj94kN1AF_8cet2L+uEkJnO59NyYgtwyfXu7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3YBdjSkwgoAzTXs_dvoiRnSFReE5-fAO7RggvVLwDthw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFU7BASXNe6TXWt7R2+tBjiob8n23VpBV5THV5hJxSHV-wKo5A@mail.gmail.com> <55118F3B.3000308@si6networks.com> <CAFU7BAQX95WmBu1r=yp38pZ3tEBrxdEX32cvHE7A8AkLjESSEA@mail.gmail.com> <5511EF4C.1050908@si6networks.com> <CAFU7BASTCrPrz+KT-45R5ojL1PVBPu4zFBnnbEJZ10vVW96btA@mail.gmail.com> <5512F64B.50805@si6networks.com> <CAFU7BAREa8Ju2h3HF+J6Zfq0q9swB-bqHOWyqhMasnQ0u6Z47w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:44:30 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFU7BAScuogagNkQAqFXpidQKSON=P2Ft1zikyPUCOPFGa9CfA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux & draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/_nY_5a612VF_CW98YRJZgI-32Us>
Cc: draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues@tools.ietf.org, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:45:10 -0000

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Fair enough. Although there are two issues here:
>>
>> 1) Allowed bounds
>> 2) Default value
>>
>>
>> For #1, removing the upper bound is good enough. But there's still #2.
>
> I like Ole's suggestion:
> “the value of the Lifetime SHOULD by default be bounded by Router Lifetime”.
> As Router Lifetime by default is 3 * MaxRtrAdvInterval, we can use that value...

Clarification (sorry for unclear wording..):
IMHO we should:

1) remove the upper bound at all and just say that Lifetime SHOULD be
> MaxRtrAdvInterval.
2) specify that the default value SHOULD be more or equal than Router
Lifetime (or 3 * MaxRtrAdvInterval or 1800 sec).

-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email