IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Linux & draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Wed, 25 March 2015 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856BB1ACE49 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k8XYR_IAqx6Y for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DBA11ACE46 for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibgn9 with SMTP id gn9so36419388wib.1 for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gf8AlrQNNOWYIA2dRgdwI03fc6k1hpION0m+Hj1HjiU=; b=Rf32C9FjRp6lmD6BAKHtGcQWoskmEwk2r53lPTPy2skqRZ/Fay1LI5HjbkTc3NAHbt mc4id7UQHU3WLBCqKjgllzFWqqnIpyxcfKutGj2zeMUkMRZD/S9szgJ+lJW8qEJ3nkD3 bn9ELItj6pu5Me8/Vtp9mLcsSNWgBw3pFpSmxzhTF/GEn8xW6I5O5lblWGf6wU/svF/O Z17SicFEQ2ZECyidHupGwH2w3FelXCD2zTGNxAZiTCIMROKoWZXZ0L6T6a5+7h1G2KQQ Fo9sUPmdXRUjI6ZcpgVZOWyPmc4JMqy32qWXKh4mZpYFkgP5YhYrxhrbkdjSVJ1oXqC/ CvdQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.90.7 with SMTP id bs7mr17329203wjb.7.1427286762188; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.58.76 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9DCE78EF-2377-45DF-8EE7-BF52365425FF@employees.org>
References: <55102C6B.1060608@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr2XfeSuQAj94kN1AF_8cet2L+uEkJnO59NyYgtwyfXu7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3YBdjSkwgoAzTXs_dvoiRnSFReE5-fAO7RggvVLwDthw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFU7BASXNe6TXWt7R2+tBjiob8n23VpBV5THV5hJxSHV-wKo5A@mail.gmail.com> <55118F3B.3000308@si6networks.com> <CAFU7BAQX95WmBu1r=yp38pZ3tEBrxdEX32cvHE7A8AkLjESSEA@mail.gmail.com> <5511EF4C.1050908@si6networks.com> <D118FE45-676C-4BAC-91D3-34A0224F7432@employees.org> <9DCE78EF-2377-45DF-8EE7-BF52365425FF@employees.org>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:32:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFU7BAQfAQkBrt8ZEQM8yH5oiXDsGxXKa=62C_kW6=ij8=FEnA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux & draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/agXzvrziIdSfICf932qayjNUPOo>
Cc: draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues@tools.ietf.org, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:32:44 -0000

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
> rather:
> “the value of the Lifetime SHOULD by default be bounded by Router Lifetime”.

Looks good to me. Particularly I like 'by default' part.

>
>> with e.g. “the value of the Lifetime SHOULD be bounded by Router Lifetime”.
>>
>
> cheers,
> Ole



-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email