IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Linux & draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Wed, 25 March 2015 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208A31B2B03 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9j0XrIKNy4rF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (banjo.employees.org [198.137.202.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFB5F1B2AFB for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D256202; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; s=selector1; bh=qNvBkkabdLNwkxGpgFZ7HiUIerM=; b= rCuWxG4hCtgnmOzr2Z0CU8/dDJ5tqAO3JHBjMirzKMzhxuxQPtupvoqhfTxAsIs3 jg6dl0qtE/4zZkryqJOidIhti/sgRCITbOS3Lmg6lrbJH0ABaFmxiF6uYR1C7+j2 Kzd38dcxCs8zjwIjJKqgwZp0stIP9xiLlz+/d0R3jbo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; q=dns; s=selector1; b=B6l83Y/YjL07DMkO0aNqqTP7h/ 8Z7r6ySl/2frVIJv2fZhhOG0yFjwL/W0IgTt8WXqW2YHdWLO3GE6Z8K4O+3YGYDs iKckN6YL+6vYlgGj79Fvq9/ILIOf2kXgjSHAx3YFnj4aPQ5GxNeJlrtTXLibaI1Q BP44Qj7o12MJ3StQc=
Received: from gomlefisk.localdomain (dhcp-b1fc.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.177.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1384861E9; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by gomlefisk.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723F0418BDC4; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:45:50 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: Linux & draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2093\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F870DFE7-FFFE-4A6B-8F5C-B243F6A4AF94"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BARMk7==0uh8=v=hE+Fi_541dq4ZQE2=9AzbB-kc57wLcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:45:49 -0500
Message-Id: <24DA057D-54FA-4A28-9588-E80D99474850@employees.org>
References: <55102C6B.1060608@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr2XfeSuQAj94kN1AF_8cet2L+uEkJnO59NyYgtwyfXu7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3YBdjSkwgoAzTXs_dvoiRnSFReE5-fAO7RggvVLwDthw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFU7BASXNe6TXWt7R2+tBjiob8n23VpBV5THV5hJxSHV-wKo5A@mail.gmail.com> <55118F3B.3000308@si6networks.com> <CAFU7BAQX95WmBu1r=yp38pZ3tEBrxdEX32cvHE7A8AkLjESSEA@mail.gmail.com> <5511EF4C.1050908@si6networks.com> <D118FE45-676C-4BAC-91D3-34A0224F7432@employees.org> <9DCE78EF-2377-45DF-8EE7-BF52365425FF@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr24MkikxdYAP0KfnB_gXOyVm7+QuZi-m+cc0_NccVn-JQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFU7BARMk7==0uh8=v=hE+Fi_541dq4ZQE2=9AzbB-kc57wLcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2093)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/t22JEpfo2YXZHRzodjljZWx_I3M>
Cc: draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues@tools.ietf.org, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:45:54 -0000

>> I disagree. Why place any limits at all? Why is it incorrect to specify a
>> higher lifetime for the DNS servers than the router lifetime?
> 
> Ah, I think the wording is confusing. We should say 'the default value
> should be Router Lifetime' and *remove* the upper limit.

that’s what I meant, while probably not what I said. ;-)

cheers,
Ole

> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> rather:
>>> “the value of the Lifetime SHOULD by default be bounded by Router
>>> Lifetime”.
>>> 
>>>> with e.g. “the value of the Lifetime SHOULD be bounded by Router
>>>> Lifetime”.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> cheers,
>>> Ole
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>> ipv6@ietf.org
>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email