IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Linux & draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 25 March 2015 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B6D1AC40A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yqG7EhDlTl0w for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5AAD1B29FF for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iedm5 with SMTP id m5so29151445ied.3 for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=DXIxsHADiovxVEIzmxC+IsAKPsgmDIUS3tZVQl/4PRo=; b=CYAVQdoHPZO4KtzfX94f223nSYe1xHhcPB9RTiUcD6X50u6R4X1oYtJ5Md0SrpB0Yq XLwERmM/t9I9EV/wmzWOIQj45MItCz7LizvM1Y4dqbbn56u5zrRI7P6nTQMGiikHVSez 5otUnSAt9Qn35pBuuiTCVvBomD55sWaN6IVJPpHw2KGGKTo7hbBabeuS/ISS+6OnD6mt t6KtQN3vSCXrUkCiqsE1FrtJxFTRdiPpynblDaikX0QsnA8LoriXnxwa5JjJaRYOUw3H VrURLsFAeKlv9GAlbbk0aY4CNbHqTCJvvAG4SfS/7Bsw6Aj0tW+nM7m6iGxLA5Tv4MpE WTEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=DXIxsHADiovxVEIzmxC+IsAKPsgmDIUS3tZVQl/4PRo=; b=Zv/OZ0hYlLlXVL6vPbvSX+jaRiMa+neJoM39AWxlWIJHxj8sG1Sg96cRgfhp2bAR1Y do2NIpe/uyNLx3sDlXiL3U45paPgqZfie59TJSON7gDNoxKT0LiQE7jRAkYVSDX37Y4/ /KWkZ4YxvKuCYNFn20TAc+/DkCqiiswOkCjDNX+tc+ftREPid8GSO5oBaLnvJ3122B4a 6bDY8ZDjHlqSMlF8bV6sfkvaImgdCE01wr/VpnHAlC2O5oOm80b4GzfZLw0XYH3k+HLY WByiEYZcGLxMn9jMCX8DcwpHXBOXIeazAt+5c3E577G0in2jO4Vm4hWR+AbEZ/vCCZmx CVxw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQll/5Fd6GTpsSrr8CpRHmNNvAtXI75vTuMls5qW/MjeE8u1eGK84Jn3FWgtrsBtRfkzmjOe
X-Received: by 10.50.122.5 with SMTP id lo5mr31304728igb.37.1427308688061; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.195.75 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9DCE78EF-2377-45DF-8EE7-BF52365425FF@employees.org>
References: <55102C6B.1060608@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr2XfeSuQAj94kN1AF_8cet2L+uEkJnO59NyYgtwyfXu7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3YBdjSkwgoAzTXs_dvoiRnSFReE5-fAO7RggvVLwDthw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFU7BASXNe6TXWt7R2+tBjiob8n23VpBV5THV5hJxSHV-wKo5A@mail.gmail.com> <55118F3B.3000308@si6networks.com> <CAFU7BAQX95WmBu1r=yp38pZ3tEBrxdEX32cvHE7A8AkLjESSEA@mail.gmail.com> <5511EF4C.1050908@si6networks.com> <D118FE45-676C-4BAC-91D3-34A0224F7432@employees.org> <9DCE78EF-2377-45DF-8EE7-BF52365425FF@employees.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:37:47 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr24MkikxdYAP0KfnB_gXOyVm7+QuZi-m+cc0_NccVn-JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux & draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e015388b6565db505122133e2"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/zNKqA06-miejC7MDQdu160FrwRo>
Cc: draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues@tools.ietf.org, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:38:15 -0000

I disagree. Why place any limits at all? Why is it incorrect to specify a
higher lifetime for the DNS servers than the router lifetime?

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:

> rather:
> “the value of the Lifetime SHOULD by default be bounded by Router
> Lifetime”.
>
> > with e.g. “the value of the Lifetime SHOULD be bounded by Router
> Lifetime”.
> >
>
> cheers,
> Ole
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email