Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long?
David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Mon, 10 June 2019 18:02 UTC
Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9710B12012B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umn.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id utNkKIK-ORh1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta-p7.oit.umn.edu (mta-p7.oit.umn.edu [134.84.196.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E1761200E3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mta-p7.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CDC677 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 18:02:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at umn.edu
Received: from mta-p7.oit.umn.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta-p7.oit.umn.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2QTkEEaIkf43 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:02:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-f199.google.com (mail-vk1-f199.google.com [209.85.221.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mta-p7.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B00A1666 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:02:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id b85so577410vke.22 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umn.edu; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6/USusIaifL9ndiRwBFsGfJFD9ym6dHxB3cSajApaH4=; b=B+VwOc4rg6267idY23fVffWax5ojvRHmEyN7ri+72OLNBDrhtoz6vamruVrmApA/Zn +iZUF6LKaQBPR0CAUvRm3JIMxEc5lxjzYfhyXpxfdBNY/qiCSQSiUfGpCP55oLPxfGK+ PRnYMIyvKHUoD5+g4toebzcisGuGwV/6v0Rsmkr0GMsBahXoYU5ZAjwJOqNfTTG4hED3 1/0vuYjGS7RvcXhEpNgSOkdFWUY1v7pAGo/jFHq+p/IgZQLnbB1eIFHFaegaYbvRPCvM 4tjcrx0ZI1KFOf11YEI7zb8yWbsikmYWluVfqAXjttlMf1LoiLnsF23K5ScHQAR8uQ7W tacw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6/USusIaifL9ndiRwBFsGfJFD9ym6dHxB3cSajApaH4=; b=cAGM3PapSlZ58txNaITwyBnHDh3+UmFHnlSL4Pf+D+PwwWmM5GM0Wei7UTRsFn9Kve dG+TDPPp5yQRD7xgATmj8jXk8NlJTyDMaxmqWitsf2C41vzscZhYMpGh23/ZiOb89bcV zGGPKaOa/JQySKE6uYdIAYdmrVOoSEYVAsU70qc8Io5cg18fV6taHvyixXtYTaa/NH4I Z7xU9IIECPVbTxocUjmvHUnFB7xrGQ+KL7ALAKTOVq1CGM80fWarbjnDgNfsjn8bwY0W 7tLOTLx2NWx1RAf1qkIUOfUff+lF6bmmkYcS5rvorLgnJwpfC/eG1gilWRL3dkj5OyRC ePMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVbcPFIB4+sGX0VqUQzI5xHzsL85H3Nnvt7pnt6TL/ADwJi6aRw 00Jq5G6NZr21EEiMz0Tn3PbTjI5dWd/xRjVR/WnFGZUePxJ/imvf9j/KJPbCxNdv/3hW9GHSlqh /WocMg33aSFbblVa6H51bTk68
X-Received: by 2002:a67:790d:: with SMTP id u13mr25527448vsc.86.1560189757450; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzkWUs3A9CjpCzzy3oNPJt2cYr0lcjUHsrtXUGvBX7AHYEef590R8wuvWfpv/eBaRg4+5BtasSRWT4jf37YGlI=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:790d:: with SMTP id u13mr25527369vsc.86.1560189756835; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ee811897e2d2438e9c3592012b725ac3@boeing.com> <CAO42Z2xyenxV+z58VW_h4skbWz14hyVt2pUd32tLZ826UoZKZA@mail.gmail.com> <9826C993-3670-4D7B-8709-B3FDE2A79359@gmail.com> <EEBC9697-18A1-41DF-95FB-33D0F5098620@consultant.com> <CABNhwV2fX9LrwzuJX297CoF1XNNM2U=m22QSVWEtaS9PQkM3Dg@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV3hA27hmdi4+WfK5ZhNPvta_d9anZA0+TJ2Uuj78kx4Cg@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV0rOT461e2Oc0S6e_fK_2zaLQ7Wk5sCFJCFO3xqeH2a9g@mail.gmail.com> <bd98b965334c43969b9f29662e7993b8@boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <bd98b965334c43969b9f29662e7993b8@boeing.com>
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:02:20 -0500
Message-ID: <CAN-Dau1fY=pUjSJMic8-OofkUjED6HyTinwH=Boq4FiHwO7nvA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long?
To: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Cc: IPv6 IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003d3cac058afbfc88"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/K4PwqiB60pX513QK7rmJcI7TlSY>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 18:02:42 -0000
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:54 AM Templin (US), Fred L < Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote: > Point 2) I am not as sure on. Why is it important for prefixes to land on > even nibble > boundaries? I can easily delegate a /63 today for example, and I don't see > anything > wrong with that. Are we saying that that should be disallowed? > No, not disallowed, nibble alignment is not required, it is simply recommended. Nibble alignment just makes it easier for humans to understand and recognize the boundary. Making things easier for humans to recognize makes it more likely they will catch their mistakes, and less likely they will make mistakes. Thanks. -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
- IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Fred Baker
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Michael Richardson
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Michael Richardson
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Nick Hilliard
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Michael Richardson
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? David Farmer
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Philip Homburg
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? James R Cutler
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Mark Smith
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Mark Smith
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? James R Cutler
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Mark Smith
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Gyan Mishra
- RE: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Yucel Guven
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? David Farmer
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Mark Smith
- RE: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Mark Smith
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Fred Baker
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Mark Smith
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Mudric, Dusan (Dusan)
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths - how long? Gyan Mishra