IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Question for IPv6 w.g. on [Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues]

itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino 2.0) Fri, 27 April 2007 11:01 UTC

Return-path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhOCn-00014a-2V; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:01:37 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhOCl-00012f-Cl for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:01:35 -0400
Received: from coconut.itojun.org ([2001:240:501:0:204:23ff:fecb:8908]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhOCk-0004Ex-Vk for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:01:35 -0400
Received: by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4A1E81C04E; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:01:32 +0900 (JST)
To: jhw@apple.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:36:26 -0700" <5E8AE577-95D3-4941-A405-B995B5275F69@apple.com>
References: <5E8AE577-95D3-4941-A405-B995B5275F69@apple.com>
X-Mailer: Cue version 0.8 (070406-1309/itojun)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <20070427110132.4A1E81C04E@coconut.itojun.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:01:32 +0900
From: itojun@itojun.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Question for IPv6 w.g. on [Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues]
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org

> On Apr 26, 2007, at 17:17, james woodyatt wrote:
> >
> > [...] I still don't think type code *ZERO* is the wrong choice [...].
> 
> Oops.  This should have read, "I still think type code *ZERO* is the  
> wrong choice..." Sorry for any confusion.

	don't worry, the world is in panic like 1912.  everybody is in panic().

itojun

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email