IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Adoption call for <draft-hinden-ipv4flag-03>

Andy Smith <ajsphila@gmail.com> Thu, 22 March 2018 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ajsphila@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C6A126D73; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pFB6Ec7WLmWA; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22b.google.com (mail-it0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9234E126C83; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id w3-v6so275827itc.4; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=cNtTpRMK4wvB/+D9MZTE3amgKjnfK4hbTvm5ToJqkMY=; b=RY5uAm7D1r5uXc7RpTNZL+Nt7O8f1Ng66sscI6cypFytqvUo6dEAmyT+0dmNViN+w/ GJ/7QxrrlMK/TQmoMxwCOILDsx+mdDUHCKOae1/R8Yzor76NAWooJAJFiIwS/Y203jqa JDA3UhAOZtdcTLPqoJJUTWLJXy4Tg5n1XRX5BegeVot7HOXlQrxXj4UHQlMzU7jarG03 KzK24lauSVAwFoA/9CPQSjPlbiqrqcWenE1uPFxgnIKjpi6YcSuIazySNh0eIxnsVZh8 NLO+hIpmVklDjgQBCGrF6vBNlqA5lqcscwarjJI1JW4zgh3i1jwF13eeJujuPCoeFZBo rBag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=cNtTpRMK4wvB/+D9MZTE3amgKjnfK4hbTvm5ToJqkMY=; b=jmOiCVF3OMa6bUOqr6zleHHaGWGC3xb1u3ZsKOyreZHFCwcJa2jOQmKTkua7HJBOvl PXZsRsWUVeMjS3NUdTLfemxiaS378ACkeXI5/Q70BQezZDjxLSUAhJTGKoOEEwoIliNo pDTDcdUtP+2f3R1hSAc5HsrFs2djtJo/uGyMCs8KtSzvA2nWUWpJUyBlDEettM2K9VTK 7UNkbWtMS4NQ86VDciZ6i+fOEfxFJb5OgDM+RrvyMvMdBlRN4lryOa+yB+0I4wZnQ5ne /5IktKgYJo1H6FJ4qYpDIyDKpbPuaux7Yg0CeKn//krivIqjN8vaG+edpFsSYHEvcGDZ eRtg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7Eb5liCK4LRRkCHjnmvTihNe2vkzHM/GuMsSvGb+eDZhJVBNuxZ qA4FaYJ5gZwch4S6XHPihil4diyr
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELv5cdNPflkfdKId0emUGqOeG0u4F4aXh0aJYIrk8gBh8ALNwunytRnV9a1jUSfUiyEZcJFiJA==
X-Received: by 2002:a24:d445:: with SMTP id x66-v6mr11390487itg.5.1521757731416; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:380:642d:d2b3:6c14:b0d5:ee8c:ad6a? ([2600:380:642d:d2b3:6c14:b0d5:ee8c:ad6a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 12-v6sm6270137itm.0.2018.03.22.15.28.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-E2E1731F-5FD0-4F04-A88F-A9BBEB8454D2"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Adoption call for <draft-hinden-ipv4flag-03>
From: Andy Smith <ajsphila@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (15D60)
In-Reply-To: <562A6850-000D-4C39-BE50-1DB6C759D6AD@employees.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:28:49 -0500
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <4B38086E-37A4-41F8-8A6E-B65CCEF4C5E2@gmail.com>
References: <562A6850-000D-4C39-BE50-1DB6C759D6AD@employees.org>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/j_-Sk4ivafDtlbdW_eAuLycckQc>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 22:28:55 -0000

I support this draft.

This proposal is a hint to IPv6 systems that IPv4 isn’t routable via this particular gateway.   

It is not necessarily a tool to extinguish IPv4 on a network — to do that, as was pointed out in the meeting, would require ether type filters on the directly attached network ports and/or AP’s.

-Andy

> On Mar 22, 2018, at 11:47 AM, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
> 
> This message starts a two week 6MAN call on adopting:
> 
>     Title     : IPv6 Router Advertisement IPv4 Unavailable Flag
>     Authors   : R. Hinden, B. Carpenter
>     Filename  : draft-hinden-ipv4flag-03
>     Pages     : 9
>     Date      : 2018-03-02
> 
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hinden-ipv4flag/
> 
> as a working group item. Substantive comments and statements of support
> for adopting this document should be directed to the mailing
> list. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors.  This adoption
> call will end on April 5th, 2018.
> 
> See also the gap analysis from sunset4 on disabling IPv4:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sunset4-gapanalysis-09#section-3
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ole Trøan
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email