Re: Adoption call for <draft-hinden-ipv4flag-03>

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 23 March 2018 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71EC12DA23 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SR-hKy-Cu4zZ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x236.google.com (mail-pl0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C6C41200A0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x236.google.com with SMTP id p9-v6so8002757pls.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jknjpr7L8wzsDMRLYpxrxN894tRaeCukcDPUX8NUa8w=; b=pWM+44YtsiJ0Rmq4w2v4zGUgLOfNr73ZAkB23lnT2adSklq9skoH3+HjbbGGw976e+ K3UbzqOav6zYOnikE48QBXTybiQpheBQiOoiwIri57o6WBZOAAC1Bog73ECqJWBjfLfa yU/I/UxWtDBUA5/JRxp+rEPlt+3QYqNuB4FWjgsHOSdb2lSspiGrdZT/ePSCt4ggGa76 /4xiCJ8wi1XQQ4fjVIpMPT0dIgrKu/sAVG2bqojDRqKp5nY8eZrV2UTWF8GFIezsbUXI Vc8CGKxxUrPvqBn0gKR8KFcl7hG+EKRqVFgEajP/CdgdZKawe5eGgohDal57+YuAVh5G 6IgA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jknjpr7L8wzsDMRLYpxrxN894tRaeCukcDPUX8NUa8w=; b=HHxZ3w1HCc7vqMny9KERzEER5JrehJq6TMxSglBhnQsIEnHD3UbV1SqT7onG1aH3vE EVMQ6htR+rjMip8JpSSOtToOtpT/btkzruLdYw6oJcJxWsuDtQOyeXdAGkApCtg6/C3I dJnCcy0WVjdqglxKJxjHch80JqutXRWURigf6qIq++TwljaE9oi5J1fe8Hn78uAdwhc7 qZyr0BW10/ejyVyAC8PR8M6cij4svGapfPHrb+ci0gSaU1dMouRKABUVt+BVgxp1e9zX AeBbB++WDfwGLquWp7+GEXImX/N/SsRpxk958KGuidWXd8yWCQwmMj9QC+UtIUDjitfy wRzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GW+MEYUsyveMde9uqVC6uclpZSXxUCge7Advi9FH3h5xcY19cD sCg2Nx/xnaygN+085Vcqt7UBhFeJldw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvopQdhTIcIkK64xJKbqmrHcc9lFqciXXoMPlNp3kYYsALeArseNoJN2q60E+/IbgiZQOEnKQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:69ce:: with SMTP id m14-v6mr31231893pln.358.1521832189306; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.43.75] ([118.148.199.244]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o184sm16366051pga.16.2018.03.23.12.09.47 for <ipv6@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Brian Carpenter <becarpenter46@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Adoption call for <draft-hinden-ipv4flag-03>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
References: <562A6850-000D-4C39-BE50-1DB6C759D6AD@employees.org> <D771C20B-83E1-4AF8-A2C0-DA44A45C4004@employees.org> <20180323115722.GO51834@gir.theapt.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <a357b0ab-c587-6343-e0b3-97e568f2e1e4@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 08:09:53 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180323115722.GO51834@gir.theapt.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/pDdv-WjfSDL-ZBiL9uGiGyohstI>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 19:09:52 -0000

On 24/03/2018 00:57, Peter Hessler wrote:
> I would be involved with an implementation for OpenBSD.
> 
> Based on my understanding of the point of this draft:
> If all RA's set the flag (and we have not yet received an DHCPACK on that
> link) we would probably want to turn off dhcpv4 on the interface, not
> enable any IPv4 link-local IP, and set sole control over resolv.conf to
> slaacd.  If any RA sets the flag to 0, or if we have already received an
> DHCPACK, then we would continue to use the link for IPv6 and IPv4 as
> normal.
> 
> Because we also have a native RA daemon, we would set this option to zero
> by default, and include a description in the documenation that an
> administrator should not set this if there is IPv4 available on the
> link.
> 
> If disabling IPv4 on that link isn't the intention of this draft, I don't
> see why we would bother.

I'd say the intention is to avoid *pointless* IPv4 traffic and its wastage
of air time and battery power, but without preventing useful IPv4 traffic.

   Brian

> 
> -peter
> 
> 
> On 2018 Mar 22 (Thu) at 17:37:02 +0000 (+0000), Ole Troan wrote:
> :I would love to hear from host implementers. If they would implement support for this flag.
> :
> :Best regards,
> :Ole
> :
> :> On 22 Mar 2018, at 16:47, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
> :> 
> :> This message starts a two week 6MAN call on adopting:
> :> 
> :>     Title     : IPv6 Router Advertisement IPv4 Unavailable Flag
> :>     Authors   : R. Hinden, B. Carpenter
> :>     Filename  : draft-hinden-ipv4flag-03
> :>     Pages     : 9
> :>     Date      : 2018-03-02
> :> 
> :>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hinden-ipv4flag/
> :> 
> :> as a working group item. Substantive comments and statements of support
> :> for adopting this document should be directed to the mailing
> :> list. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors.  This adoption
> :> call will end on April 5th, 2018.
> :> 
> :> See also the gap analysis from sunset4 on disabling IPv4:
> :> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sunset4-gapanalysis-09#section-3
> :> 
> :> Regards,
> :> 
> :> Ole Trøan
> :> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> :> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> :> ipv6@ietf.org
> :> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> :> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>