Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>
Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 29 October 2010 09:37 UTC
Return-Path: <wdec.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3633A67AB for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JzduV68cjb5j for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D783A677E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so2532621bwz.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Lfz1E0OzqX3V6hHpPvP7rA523JhELBiKpD/OKY/mDFk=; b=q2BKOIK7TeKhLrOsAaPP/KnKDFzXWM2u+vBcpWeAA/2vJXzFZv0+xBCa+4f9Isdg4x j6nZa0AFVaSmKui0WFrQJEpiXtN+z0DTsaNwsMg1FIr6tf5Yg9MfNE8rgHAsvZP+JMd7 2TY/xDSBih5sIbQL7Zljuo2IDpfCcsddL3c6s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=nStov1aXoDqWKruL1WGSozw9+DJ09o4rcBMgmSdzESD0/og8Yq83IVNshMSMVcV72O CPZm40SB3T94oT7Y5ghmjIrVEi4seoeWafXDud4oCg0EE584szRyCIABlxKtXrHKBJE5 Pks2yAo31e6CzD5kneiawPDCx7HyzgUD80GnE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.59.9 with SMTP id j9mr1554383bkh.150.1288345156814; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.116.76 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <044C6E32-1F31-4E51-94F2-759DFEB7F7E7@gmail.com>
References: <3F7E0126-76FB-43BA-B25F-1EE226FA73AA@gmail.com> <AANLkTikzO6yR5Uqx9V-htYBdMHhgk3pR1NerthAmRamV@mail.gmail.com> <044C6E32-1F31-4E51-94F2-759DFEB7F7E7@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:39:16 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTim3qjg72GTbFQtn=0ffbcYz4KPfn_kM+uODKsZ-@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>
From: Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001636eefc8a6b87270493be3b16"
Cc: IPv6 WG Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:37:27 -0000
Bob, Brian, I'd like to push back on this consensus call. I am currently -1 on it. Questions on the requirements, scope of solution, as well as its present validity were raised and unanswered, in some cases totally, in others incompletely or incoherently: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg12986.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg12993.html Summary of the problems: - Requirements: Unarticulated in terms of why IETF standard track solutions acceptable in similar deployments are not acceptable in this case. - Requirements: The Solution attributes to the access node very distinct IP interface, forwarding and processing capabilities, which was said to be previously unacceptable - Critical state and failure modes un-addressed, no smaller in consequence to the ones that resulted in draft -07 not being accepted. - ICMPv6 (RS) signalling is being (ab)used for line state signalling. Likely overlap and conflict with other IETF WGs. Thanks, Woj. On 28 October 2010 22:53, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote: > All, > > The chairs believe there is a consensus to adopt this document as a 6man > working group document. The next version will be published as a w.g. > document. > > We also note that there are still open issues that need to be resolved > before we could start a w.g. last call. > > Thanks for all the feedback on this work. > > Regards, > > Bob & Brian > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 8:01 AM, Bob Hinden wrote: > > > Correction: The consensus call will end on October 28, 2010. > > > > Bob > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> 6MAN WG, > >> > >> This is a consensus call on adopting: > >> > >> Title : Line identification in IPv6 Router Solicitation > >> messages > >> Author(s) : S. Krishnan, et al. > >> Filename : draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt > >> Pages : 9 > >> Date : 2010-09-20 > >> > >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08 > >> > >> as a 6MAN working group document. The authors believe this version > resolves issues raised on the mailing list in the last consensus call. > >> > >> Please state your opinion, positive or negative, on the mailing or to > the chairs. This consensus call will end on October 18, 2010. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Bob & Brian > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Suresh Krishnan
- AW: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Olaf.Bonness
- Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-r… Bob Hinden
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Bob Hinden
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Randy Bush
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Philip Homburg
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Philip Homburg
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Philip Homburg
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Bob Hinden
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Philip Homburg
- RE: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Laganier, Julien
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Philip Homburg
- RE: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Laganier, Julien
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Philip Homburg
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Wojciech Dec
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Wojciech Dec
- RE: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Balázs Varga A
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Wojciech Dec
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Ole Troan
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Bob Hinden
- RE: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… David Allan I
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Ole Troan
- AW: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Olaf.Bonness
- RE: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Alan Kavanagh
- Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Wojciech Dec
- RE: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6m… Alan Kavanagh