Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Thu, 21 October 2010 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6923A6835 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.618
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.618 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NeVlVtifMd5O for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F583A67F6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pwj4 with SMTP id 4so184212pwj.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=z9peosh7TJbZ2D+gZCrrSM9JsKxs2DPQi6uhI2rgP/o=; b=HzbTwLxykid3ps0L0cgcbm7zXp3ZFipTKgMVVnTPCl9CQWip78PzCju+cSN6Ji5hW+ cAlhL2AA8IRx/6UuIg9Xzv/pkeg5qhcj9A96WQP+8ms4dAzxXSBI+wbL+H1yMuAGONDW PkTJmUCCYCEKXYO6sBcNt0F+t2Lbp78OuV/CA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=CqOsIbbYtbq1ZulPzfniNRqltdiGQGRJ4AZQ/JnAT2vTkTj9I4RRxiYDwHhPH6CnXc NXdFT1j2PPSsVCc64LTrc4zogLK9fCQAIN75u+mWQrNh7KG6rmthUSsX8PI3qVfth8uf UzNWRq6KikIewafdWr7kzYnbb7DjZuV2hTXGM=
Received: by 10.142.238.15 with SMTP id l15mr1218849wfh.7.1287687362456; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.224.217] ([209.97.127.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y42sm2875309wfd.10.2010.10.21.11.56.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F7E0126-76FB-43BA-B25F-1EE226FA73AA@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:56:00 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <79ECC38B-B7AD-47B1-B6A4-E0B4F75B91F1@gmail.com>
References: <3F7E0126-76FB-43BA-B25F-1EE226FA73AA@gmail.com>
To: IPv6 WG Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:54:27 -0000

One personal comment, 

I think the title should be changed to something like "Line Identification Destination Option" as it is proposing to create a new destination option and uses tunneling.  In other words, it is no longer adding line identification to RS messages.

Bob



On Oct 21, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:

> 6MAN WG,
> 
> This is a consensus call on adopting:
> 
>    Title     : Line identification in IPv6 Router Solicitation
>                messages
>    Author(s) : S. Krishnan, et al.
>    Filename  : draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt
>    Pages     : 9
>    Date      : 2010-09-20
> 
>    http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08
> 
> as a 6MAN working group document.  The authors believe this version resolves issues raised on the mailing list in the last consensus call.  
> 
> Please state your opinion, positive or negative, on the mailing or to the chairs.  This consensus call will end on October 18, 2010.
> 
> Regards,
> Bob & Brian
> 
> 
> 
>