IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc?

"John G. Scudder" <jgs@bgp.nu> Thu, 12 March 2009 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jgs@bgp.nu>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DBB3A6BE0 for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.043
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.043 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_IS_SMALL6=0.556]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YzqxIOT7deX4 for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bgp.nu (bgp.nu [64.27.28.76]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C943A6BD8 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (bgp.nu [64.27.28.76]) by bgp.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C6553E030; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:23:40 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bgp.nu
Received: from bgp.nu ([64.27.28.76]) by localhost (bgp.nu [64.27.28.76]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Q9izGuRJtSZm; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:23:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.10.4] (217-175-223-162.dyn-pool.spidernet.net [217.175.223.162]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bgp.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43E653E002; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:23:33 -0500 (EST)
References: <4DA24C33-CD5D-4F6D-8A32-3BA9B370D34C@cisco.com> <78513537-4218-4E50-92BE-C7CACD99D239@bgp.nu> <49B92B11.6060504@raszuk.net>
Message-Id: <FC3D0DAD-03C8-4C06-AB82-8AF67A1A622F@bgp.nu>
From: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@bgp.nu>
To: "robert@raszuk.net" <robert@raszuk.net>
In-Reply-To: <49B92B11.6060504@raszuk.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (5G77)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 5G77)
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:23:26 +0200
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@rawdofmt.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc?
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:23:04 -0000

I hadn't noticed that. The substance of the comment stands in any  
case, that I would like to see those points addressed.

--John



On Mar 12, 2009, at 5:32 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> May I ask what is the point of continuing the process of voting  
> after WG chairs have already declared the draft 8 days ago to be a  
> WG document ?
>
> Cheers,
> R.
>
>
> See below:
>
> Subject: [Isis-wg] l2isis is a WG doc
> From: David Ward <dward@cisco.com>
> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:18:40 -0600
> To: isis-wg@ietf.org
> CC: trill-chairs@tools.ietf.org, Christian Hopps <chopps@rawdofmt.org>
>
> Given the WG is now debating how to bring L2 routing into ISIS and  
> there has been no dissent to work on the topic; it is now a WG item.  
> There is an ongoing discussion on how to do it but, let's put the  
> answer in the doc that was put forward:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ward-l2isis-04
>
> Thanks
>
> -DWard, CHopps
>
>
>
>
>
>> I'd like to see a more thorough discussion of Hannes's points  
>> before accepting this.
>> So, no, for now anyway.
>> --John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email