IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc?

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 12 March 2009 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06403A6B84 for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zO6zrdICzsQL for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail37.opentransfer.com (mail37.opentransfer.com [76.162.254.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2065D3A69E2 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 4224 invoked by uid 399); 12 Mar 2009 15:32:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (83.5.232.169) by mail37.opentransfer.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2009 15:32:38 -0000
Message-ID: <49B92B11.6060504@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:32:33 -0700
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@bgp.nu>
References: <4DA24C33-CD5D-4F6D-8A32-3BA9B370D34C@cisco.com> <78513537-4218-4E50-92BE-C7CACD99D239@bgp.nu>
In-Reply-To: <78513537-4218-4E50-92BE-C7CACD99D239@bgp.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@rawdofmt.org>, isis-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc?
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert@raszuk.net
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:32:02 -0000

Hi John,

May I ask what is the point of continuing the process of voting after WG 
chairs have already declared the draft 8 days ago to be a WG document ?

Cheers,
R.


See below:

Subject: [Isis-wg] l2isis is a WG doc
From: David Ward <dward@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:18:40 -0600
To: isis-wg@ietf.org
CC: trill-chairs@tools.ietf.org, Christian Hopps <chopps@rawdofmt.org>

Given the WG is now debating how to bring L2 routing into ISIS and there 
has been no dissent to work on the topic; it is now a WG item. There is 
an ongoing discussion on how to do it but, let's put the answer in the 
doc that was put forward:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ward-l2isis-04

Thanks

-DWard, CHopps





> I'd like to see a more thorough discussion of Hannes's points before 
> accepting this.
> 
> So, no, for now anyway.
> 
> --John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email