Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc?
<gregory.cauchie@orange-ftgroup.com> Wed, 25 February 2009 18:09 UTC
Return-Path: <gregory.cauchie@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E1E3A6AC5 for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:09:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mGqTGVgkFw4p for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:09:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCB53A6912 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:09:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ftrdmel3.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.193.117.155]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:09:26 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:09:23 +0100
Message-ID: <2AF8FF7D89242541B12E7A47F6ECB4BE083BB6C8@ftrdmel3>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc?
Thread-Index: AcmGSiZjbuAs9tf1Sk2OuOKFKesCLARJDSJA
References: <4DA24C33-CD5D-4F6D-8A32-3BA9B370D34C@cisco.com>
From: gregory.cauchie@orange-ftgroup.com
To: dward@cisco.com, isis-wg@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Feb 2009 18:09:26.0579 (UTC) FILETIME=[31E3E830:01C99774]
Cc: chopps@rawdofmt.org
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc?
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:09:09 -0000
Hi folks, This draft seems to answer correctly the requirement for using IS-IS as a layer-2 routing protocol. I have though one clarification question to the authors regarding the MAC-RI TLV (in 2.1) which is as a sub-TLV but also defined as directly carried in a L1 LSP. I think it is a "regular" TLV, right? Furthermore, I was asking mysef why did you define some "root" TLVs. IINM, lots of TLVs defined in this draft are extending IS-IS to support multicast routing as it was made in OSPF with MOSPF and its type-6 LSA. And if I am still right, there is no definition in MOSPF of such "root" information to flood. Therefore I was wondering why did you choose to define such TLVs. Finally, I have one question related to Hannes concerns. As an ISP, I really do care about convergence times. You state in §3 that the reason for defining the Multicast Group PDU was because we shall expect a much higher frequency of join/leave changes than of topology changes. I totally agree on that and I do understand this definition as a way to isolate topological LSP convergence from a multicast LSP convergence. But as you did not define any new mechanisms to treat this new LSP type I assume that both topological and multicast LSP types will use the same timers regarding SPF calculation (wait and hold-timers) and transmission intervals. So at the end I do not see how you will be able to make the topological convergence isolated from the multicast one. Thanks, -- Greg > -----Message d'origine----- > De : isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de David Ward > Envoyé : mardi 3 février 2009 22:54 > À : isis-wg@ietf.org > Cc : Christian Hopps > Objet : [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? > > All - > > Please let us know if you believe this document should be > accepted as a WG document: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ward-l2isis-04 > > Thanks > > Chris, Dave > _______________________________________________ > Isis-wg mailing list > Isis-wg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg >
- [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? David Ward
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? mike shand
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? stefano previdi
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? Ronald Nsubuga
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? Ayan Banerjee
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? Hannes Gredler
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? Hannes Gredler
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? gregory.cauchie
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? Ayan Banerjee
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? Ayan Banerjee
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? Hannes Gredler
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? Ayan Banerjee
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? Hannes Gredler
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? John G. Scudder
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? John G. Scudder
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Isis-wg] Accept as WG doc? Hannes Gredler