Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-05.txt
Hasmit Grover <hasmit@cisco.com> Wed, 05 May 2010 04:01 UTC
Return-Path: <hasmit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D41D3A67D6 for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 May 2010 21:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZDHvS708zLcf for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 May 2010 21:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEAF3A63EB for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2010 21:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,330,1270425600"; d="scan'208";a="192633406"
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.223.137]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 May 2010 04:01:30 +0000
Received: from sjc-vpn5-1232.cisco.com (sjc-vpn5-1232.cisco.com [10.21.92.208]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4541TIk010903; Wed, 5 May 2010 04:01:30 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hasmit Grover <hasmit@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <000f01caec07$451523e0$108a2f0a@china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 21:01:28 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4B9960C2-5078-41A4-8F1F-634D2B42D769@cisco.com>
References: <000f01caec07$451523e0$108a2f0a@china.huawei.com>
To: Peter Ashwood-Smith <Peter.AshwoodSmith@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-05.txt
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 04:01:45 -0000
I am not proposing that we should not debate OTV TLVs and question their existence. We are open to any questions and concerns regarding the OTV TLV. -Hasmit On May 4, 2010, at 8:58 PM, Peter Ashwood-Smith wrote: > The reason we all go to standards bodies is to contribute/debate/participate > in the evolution of the Internet. > > I've been able to debate/participate openly with the Trill folks over the > last few years, they publish minutes, have an email list, regular meetings > etc. etc. > > I've been able to debate openly with the IEEE 802.1aq folks over the last > few years, minutes, email lists, regular meetings etc. > > Please explain to me where and when I've had the opportunity to debate OTV > and why that is not a problem? > > Peter > > -----Original Message----- > From: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Hasmit Grover > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 11:17 PM > To: Fedyk, Donald (Don) > Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-05.txt > > > Donald, > > As per draft-ietf-isis-layer it's intent is to capture the IS-IS extensions > used by protocols running over L2. Like other protocols mentioned in the > draft, OTV is also an L2 protocol which is using some of the TLVs mentioned > in the draft. It is really important that all the IS-IS TLV codepoints are > captured in a single document so that different implementations can inter-op > with each other. > > -Hasmit > > On May 4, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Fedyk, Donald (Don) wrote: > >> Hi Dhananjaya >> >> It is rather unprecedented to have material published in a WG document > before it is in an individual draft and there is a consensus to add it. >> >> So for the changes for OTV they really should go in an individual draft > and be discussed on their own merits. >> >> Do you and your authors agree? >> >> Don >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Dhananjaya Rao (dhrao) >> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 6:45 PM >> To: isis-wg@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-05.txt >> >> >> >> Hi folks, >> >> We're just catching up on the discussions on the mailing list regarding > the L2 IS-IS draft-ietf-isis-layer2-04.txt. As the authors of OTV, we'd like > to clarify any doubts or concerns regarding the extensions used by OTV. >> >> Briefly, OTV uses the L2 IS-IS extensions being defined to provide a > solution for interconnecting datacenter networks. An I-D describing the > solution has been recently published at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hasmit-otv-00. >> >> OTV shares along with TRILL/802.1aq several of the PDU/TLVs that have been > defined in this draft. There are of course a few additional sub-TLVs defined > specifically for OTV: >> >> - A couple of hello extensions to advertise L2 site membership and >> capabilities. >> - A group membership sub-TLV to advertise multicast source information. >> >> The solution is already being deployed in several enterprise networks and > a final product with this solution is shipping soon. Given the multiple > technologies using L2 IS-IS, we'd like to ensure the extensions and > codepoints are published in a common document to aid interoperable > implementations. >> >> Please let us know if you have any questions. >> >> Thanks, >> -Dhananjaya (for the authors) >> >> >>> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>> directories. >>> This draft is a work item of the IS-IS for IP Internets Working Group >>> of the IETF. >>> >>> >>> Title : Extensions to IS-IS for Layer-2 Systems >>> Author(s) : A. Banerjee, et al. >>> Filename : draft-ietf-isis-layer2-05.txt >>> Pages : 60 >>> Date : 2010-04-30 >>> >>> This document specifies the IS-IS extensions necessary to support >>> multi-link IPv4 and IPv6 networks, as well as to provide true link >>> state routing to any protocols running directly over layer 2. While >>> supporting this concept involves several pieces, this document only >>> describes extensions to IS-IS. We leave it to the systems using these >>> IS-IS extensions to explain how the information carried in IS-IS is >>> used. >>> >>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-layer2-05.txt >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader >>> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the >>> Internet-Draft. >>> >>> <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-layer2-05.txt> >> _______________________________________________ >> Isis-wg mailing list >> Isis-wg@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg >> _______________________________________________ >> Isis-wg mailing list >> Isis-wg@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg > > _______________________________________________ > Isis-wg mailing list > Isis-wg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg >
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Dhananjaya Rao (dhrao)
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… John E Drake
- [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-05.txt Internet-Drafts
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Bragg, Nigel
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Peter Ashwood-Smith
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Dhananjaya Rao (dhrao)
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Fedyk, Donald (Don)
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Hasmit Grover
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Peter Ashwood-Smith
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Hasmit Grover
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Paul Unbehagen
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… David Allan I
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Ralph Droms
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… John E Drake
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Ralph Droms
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Fedyk, Donald (Don)
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Peter Ashwood-Smith
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Victor Moreno (vimoreno)
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Erik Nordmark
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… David Allan I
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… David Allan I
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… David Allan I
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Erik Nordmark
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Fedyk, Donald (Don)
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… David Allan I
- Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-0… Donald Eastlake