Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing-06
David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net> Tue, 18 July 2017 09:35 UTC
Return-Path: <equinox@diac24.net>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DC9131A8C for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rdsa2W2NMPTq for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eidolon.nox.tf (eidolon.nox.tf [IPv6:2a07:2ec0:2185::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF71D131945 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from equinox by eidolon.nox.tf with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <equinox@diac24.net>) id 1dXOus-003vuK-4k; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:35:42 +0200
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:35:42 +0200
From: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
To: "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Cc: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <20170718093542.GL773745@eidolon>
References: <87d1i34dgr.fsf@chopps.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87d1i34dgr.fsf@chopps.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/sPvdQwxLvwsyEn1Bi3daQd9hBzw>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing-06
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:35:47 -0000
Hello IS-IS folks, so, I've unfortunately dropped the ball on this (had some health issues, but really I'm just bad at IETF interactions). I'd like to apologize for that and am certainly working to improve. Having just sat through a v6ops presentation of Microsoft's setup for their enterprise cloud products relying on multihomed IPv6 setups with distinct source prefixes pushed to clients, I'm re-motivated that this is a draft worth pushing to RFC -- this is after similar signaling from Google. Hence, question #1: I strongly believe we have the input there that this will see deployment in IS-IS in enterprise setups. Certainly not all of them, but enough to be significant. Les, does this address your concerns on actual deployment? (Does anyone else have similar concerns?) After that, question #2 would be - what state is this draft actually in now? Should I ask for WG adoption again? As far as I can tell responses were along "support", "support + address feedback" and "scepticism on whether it'll actually be deployed". I didn't see any flat-out disagreement. And, finally, #3, I (still, gah) have some pending edits addressing some feedback Tony raised; correlated with previous question, I'm not sure whether I should just repost it as individual draft ASAP? (and/or how/whether this interacts with the adoption call. [I guess the latter 2 are questions for the chairs, but I'll happy about all input ;)] Thanks for any help, -David
- [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-ds… chopps
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isi… David Lamparter
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isi… Fred Baker
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isi… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isi… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isi… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isi… Alia Atlas
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isi… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isi… Alia Atlas
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isi… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isi… David Lamparter
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isi… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isi… David Lamparter
- Re: [Isis-wg] updated draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-s… David Lamparter
- Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isi… Tony Przygienda