IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 23 August 2019 15:22 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01240120897 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 08:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ekrYrBkA_xzc for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 08:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56BF112085F for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 08:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561FD300AF9 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 11:03:29 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id EZyEY3orHGZM for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 11:03:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (unknown [138.88.156.37]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2167C3004AF; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 11:03:28 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <ACAE2C8D-B0DD-4BE3-BE97-8F2DC945046E@vigilsec.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 11:22:44 -0400
Cc: Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F5850185-6835-47DB-A7F9-FED44EE3F7FB@vigilsec.com>
References: <DB2176AC-393A-418D-8319-FCF9B899BF6F@vigilsec.com> <92B3C3FD-4555-4BBB-9586-6997ABD409FB@kaloom.com> <A0DE2C48-7E00-4CBB-B543-99F28D4F12A4@vigilsec.com> <ACAE2C8D-B0DD-4BE3-BE97-8F2DC945046E@vigilsec.com>
To: its <its@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/Rr6CDSbUYdqBb2qayZr_m2e9j_0>
Subject: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 15:22:49 -0000

Dear IPWAVE WG:

We do not see the need for a meeting in Singapore.  We believe that mail list discussion is needed to wrap up the Problem Statement document.

We observe that the energy in this WG is pretty low.  As a result, we are quite reluctant to re-charter to tackle new work items.  The Problem Statement document includes many potential topics, but without a great deal more energy, this WG does not seem to be the right place to tackle them.  This means that the IPWAVE WG will be closed down once the current charter is complete unless the chairs and our AD see a significant increase in energy for one or more potential work items.  This will be measured by individual Internet-Draft posting and mail list discussion of them.

Russ and Carlos

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email