Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore

[Charlie Perkins <[e-mail]>]

Hello Paul,

Please excuse my delay.  I will get the review done in the next week.

Regards,
Charlie P.

On 8/24/2019 1:55 AM, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong wrote:
> Hi Russ and Carlos,
> My SKKU team have been working for IPWAVE Neighbor Discovery for 
> IETF-104 and IETF-105.
> For IETF-106, my team are working for IPWAVE Mobility Management.
> The IPWAVE Neighbor Discovery draft will be coauthored by my SKKU team 
> and Sandra Cespedes
> for next revision.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-neighbor-discovery/ 
>
>
> The IPWAVE Mobility Management draft will be coauthored by my SKKU 
> team and Sri Gundavelli
> for next revision.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-mobility-management/ 
> <https://datatracker..ietf.org/doc/draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-mobility-management/> 
>
>
> For the IPWAVE PS draft, Charlie Perkins was supposed to confirm 
> whether my revision satisfies his
> comments or not. For one month, there was no feedback from him.
> It seems like he cannot afford to review it due to his personal issues.
>
> I would like to ask you as IPWAVE WG chairs to be able to lead our 
> group more actively by
> reviewing the PS draft and submitting it to the IESG through the WG 
> last call..
>
> After the completion of the IPWAVE PS draft, our group will be able to 
> discuss the rechartering and
> new work items.
>
> By the way, I met an engineer from the Hyundai automotive to discuss 
> IPWAVE-based applications
> for vehicles. His team implemented a remote charging system control 
> protocol for electric vehicles
> using IEEE 802.11n, and will use IEEE 802.11-OCB for this system.
> His team are looking for use cases of IPWAVE protocols such as 
> context-aware navigator to show
> neighbor vehicles and pedestrians.
>
> If IPWAVE WG is closed, we will lose the opportunity to enable our 
> IPWAVE work items described in the PS draft
> that are the near-future demands in automotive industry.
>
> As my personal request, it will be great to have a short IPWAVE WG 
> session this Singapore meeting.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
> Paul
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:22 AM Russ Housley <[e-mail] 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>     Dear IPWAVE WG:
>
>     We do not see the need for a meeting in Singapore.  We believe
>     that mail list discussion is needed to wrap up the Problem
>     Statement document.
>
>     We observe that the energy in this WG is pretty low.  As a result,
>     we are quite reluctant to re-charter to tackle new work items. 
>     The Problem Statement document includes many potential topics, but
>     without a great deal more energy, this WG does not seem to be the
>     right place to tackle them..  This means that the IPWAVE WG will
>     be closed down once the current charter is complete unless the
>     chairs and our AD see a significant increase in energy for one or
>     more potential work items.  This will be measured by individual
>     Internet-Draft posting and mail list discussion of them.
>
>     Russ and Carlos
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     its mailing list
>     [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>
>
>
> -- 
> ===========================
> Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor
> Department of Software
> Sungkyunkwan University
> Office: [phone]
> Email: [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>, 
> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
> Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php 
> <http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php>
>
> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its