Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore
Sandra Céspedes <scespede@niclabs.cl> Mon, 26 August 2019 16:54 UTC
Return-Path: <scespede@niclabs.cl>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB48120A52 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 09:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=niclabs-cl.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U2pbx4IK4d6w for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 09:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x530.google.com (mail-pg1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A11D3120AAB for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 09:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x530.google.com with SMTP id d1so10960619pgp.4 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 09:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=niclabs-cl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=nQpHIaYQFZOlrc5aosYyFCuDWVSNHsMULWKvfS7wsD0=; b=kYh/TKIUxECrDhDHvRAE0jWK595enDmdaLrooSaCI1xqrYYR/fPDypUVySCL/Ju+4C pwEjwHNHNngpYx1wI9pNjI+thZ90WZtqftJuiCRobgNQyv3q9FPFyl17QUlVR/91HUh5 tdqmBxq0kUBGCIt6RxBvB0Wer9wPcxyqeV4GLgLpOjm+VASmfZCX5lgQwnT6FL40VPBE kAOLDrkrr4cOjMemX2LccUeoflELD+ISQpc5/T84D0ZbsZaBKjNKHUyoBItaZELJK4Dk m+stoDKwqP9wlSkAMIdvhSPPIW53vnmfUS/4+sRLw98z07/H9Z4Uz2hQFMnRm+ni81mt sMcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nQpHIaYQFZOlrc5aosYyFCuDWVSNHsMULWKvfS7wsD0=; b=EDSlkYiPcgIgtKLMLBGxMBiV3fWP8DJAKJ+N1wn5p2Hq0JXJJ6qZnnywJMcbb1VFGP IawfDR2KOfChLFZoeSCHGZusJDuulrhxoxKHwc/Rk2lxDjm7I7mEPrUWiBXlxL/TdDyJ OPrCWjgJUEQiX+KgIU6vDKz1NlLhJoZh9J0N6I8zFQPi0AVdD2GW4p/T3bU8NoXMTh1K mt9am5SBFpUdRe1j+fxG8WzyklFA3j6GS1iLtoSf7BULSRhDOyHz7GyHr4t1rGTNbhNu 9Z3Vn/pq6LDfwwasqb28i/yGTQgPOeQHTJ1lCQh6sdlrf8uJLpiWqdGtvA7NSemibg4T 2RPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXsZhFJXdgUqkW7oiAQVZ1FFfMe12q1EP1JS7uAM2JUMdaRURKL OpnRJnXU2O5iSjcHalxhXc5bsf0pAI9NeHALPdhrrA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxxQFBm/RIBJi6hz1NEVL2rhw5mnYQR8EXzob4Cs10AP+5ZhlQMJ9uU+f8sXxD2pt+jaT/+hCKujdThuVt3B+Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:3ec7:: with SMTP id l190mr7201805pga.334.1566838438686; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 09:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DB2176AC-393A-418D-8319-FCF9B899BF6F@vigilsec.com> <92B3C3FD-4555-4BBB-9586-6997ABD409FB@kaloom.com> <A0DE2C48-7E00-4CBB-B543-99F28D4F12A4@vigilsec.com> <ACAE2C8D-B0DD-4BE3-BE97-8F2DC945046E@vigilsec.com> <F5850185-6835-47DB-A7F9-FED44EE3F7FB@vigilsec.com> <CAPK2DezKRY0m5BABmsR-8YXVYj_0Uc1Wr+XzifWmm3GrNS=Vww@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPK2DezKRY0m5BABmsR-8YXVYj_0Uc1Wr+XzifWmm3GrNS=Vww@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: scespedes@ing.uchile.cl
From: Sandra Céspedes <scespede@niclabs.cl>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 12:53:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CACyVfe6kzVgs6EOHwP1-rcYS3A2v9SEcwbewuDtVOCYes9=XPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com>, its <its@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008eff6605910800eb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/cUxZmHZbBTz5GOaxl5kBXM8Gj0U>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:54:03 -0000
Dear all, I support Paul's point of view and agree that there are still work items that could be addressed in the IPWAVE WG. The rechartering process has been delayed due to the slow advancement with the current documents, but at least I do have interest in the group moving forward to the problems detected in the PS document and other ideas that may appear. I hope we can continue working on the frame of the IPWAVE WG, Regards, Sandra Céspedes On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 4:56 AM Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong < jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Russ and Carlos, > My SKKU team have been working for IPWAVE Neighbor Discovery for IETF-104 > and IETF-105. > For IETF-106, my team are working for IPWAVE Mobility Management. > The IPWAVE Neighbor Discovery draft will be coauthored by my SKKU team > and Sandra Cespedes > for next revision. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-neighbor-discovery/ > > > The IPWAVE Mobility Management draft will be coauthored by my SKKU team > and Sri Gundavelli > for next revision. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-mobility-management/ > <https://datatracker..ietf.org/doc/draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-mobility-management/> > > > For the IPWAVE PS draft, Charlie Perkins was supposed to confirm whether > my revision satisfies his > comments or not. For one month, there was no feedback from him. > It seems like he cannot afford to review it due to his personal issues. > > I would like to ask you as IPWAVE WG chairs to be able to lead our group > more actively by > reviewing the PS draft and submitting it to the IESG through the WG last > call.. > > After the completion of the IPWAVE PS draft, our group will be able to > discuss the rechartering and > new work items. > > By the way, I met an engineer from the Hyundai automotive to discuss > IPWAVE-based applications > for vehicles. His team implemented a remote charging system control > protocol for electric vehicles > using IEEE 802.11n, and will use IEEE 802.11-OCB for this system. > His team are looking for use cases of IPWAVE protocols such as > context-aware navigator to show > neighbor vehicles and pedestrians. > > If IPWAVE WG is closed, we will lose the opportunity to enable our IPWAVE > work items described in the PS draft > that are the near-future demands in automotive industry. > > As my personal request, it will be great to have a short IPWAVE WG session > this Singapore meeting. > > Thanks. > > Best Regards, > Paul > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:22 AM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> > wrote: > >> Dear IPWAVE WG: >> >> We do not see the need for a meeting in Singapore. We believe that mail >> list discussion is needed to wrap up the Problem Statement document. >> >> We observe that the energy in this WG is pretty low. As a result, we are >> quite reluctant to re-charter to tackle new work items. The Problem >> Statement document includes many potential topics, but without a great deal >> more energy, this WG does not seem to be the right place to tackle them.. >> This means that the IPWAVE WG will be closed down once the current charter >> is complete unless the chairs and our AD see a significant increase in >> energy for one or more potential work items. This will be measured by >> individual Internet-Draft posting and mail list discussion of them. >> >> Russ and Carlos >> >> _______________________________________________ >> its mailing list >> its@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its >> > > > -- > =========================== > Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D. > Associate Professor > Department of Software > Sungkyunkwan University > Office: +82-31-299-4957 > Email: jaehoon.paul@gmail.com, pauljeong@skku.edu > Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php > <http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php> > _______________________________________________ > its mailing list > its@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its >
- [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Russ Housley
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Charlie Perkins
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Chris Shen
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Tae Oh
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore 선경재
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Sandra Céspedes
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- [ipwave] 회신: IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore 김증일 글로벌R&D마스터
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Russ Housley
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Charlie Perkins
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [ipwave] IPWAVE WG will not meet in Singapore Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong