Re: [ipwave] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-28: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> Wed, 25 May 2022 10:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84EFC15EB57; Wed, 25 May 2022 03:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HK_NAME_FM_MR_MRS=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id guDffHmhHUhH; Wed, 25 May 2022 03:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FD37C15EB53; Wed, 25 May 2022 03:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id q15so3373122edb.11; Wed, 25 May 2022 03:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wStFNw4X93epC0hBjyJdtOa77aRqxtfb9T6LcyoaQEE=; b=DotgzTckojqS6ZMjuOShuz2xg0FiYZf+O5oAz2zPwtYwC1Q5yiq707t2qENvAhaMGl GKPQMPxP1x2ypZZaMoaF1AWvD/WKyZ0S/hec4ppMgcmA10bUCcLu4JRDiRVBtqRH5A+y Tqxg+iGB7vBLTqLK77r8C3GkNEVhOrjm23MICuJ2nCp7p4UgR1pqQ7zg2YhxwsA9xjkX D4sqorj0EoVKGMd/f/7jjRqlAvEfWwliTcDz+1Y9Wgva/vqf0LO2pTnfBAUBo0cI78nq 6A4M26qAfzKBa4LM81Qchwn3d/NriG2+E/X/u2SL9HbEKbwuEdqZbZ76szj90IaJNbyw fJ3g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wStFNw4X93epC0hBjyJdtOa77aRqxtfb9T6LcyoaQEE=; b=q7kDSiXAgo6Pajf5AF8HQQtf6sLIOVubnfSCvqO5tuWvjzyN4vSjAsqVD7vHwWKqPJ yNyrG7I6PyI3MQbuwXZoD2vFJEHvevJ6zc/uueXBkGWle4J1ga5pcbeIOc8oxAqioYQn arxN4Mub1KKInEQXeAN1XC3xZuplmNRAesOOVHDfvo1DlTYdJSsIgRmvE5LmLwjjlFOT 2VCCo5rvXjuOxUt+2m1EyZBRusl9tVqWworOkEdFxP4tNCakLQzZ9Z/rOTWGpCYG4ak8 62ti4rBEQKyiBTBTKoFCSLOKHIfGnRbfJP6spZjxF/Cp3Nc7RE52GMo0/Aby2OsbazTc 2V/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532r02P6Ijpkb47n7rXEB/zSrM+ssWSHglMICIqv6W0cjf3DuKTR +MlvG+8v8M/+Th9H5q2NqxdSsBvpc2Jpq+hEhgY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3f4s2qJTy5JvZ3fJfWvwU7FZ3PH29N66c9wnnkVZq+2Wj55W+r2hMTz7SOUFSZ+I1JdP7Gkn6GyQF03qnq38=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:fd11:0:b0:42a:b6af:6e13 with SMTP id i17-20020a50fd11000000b0042ab6af6e13mr33858041eds.221.1653475989293; Wed, 25 May 2022 03:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164922662907.16687.3467089534808946908@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAPK2DezzymMEiQVtGeAc4RK7Bdn6Hw34cgW_s_1cOeZCt2bE9w@mail.gmail.com> <AE6F606A-A5C2-40FF-976D-2808DA7B8E58@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <AE6F606A-A5C2-40FF-976D-2808DA7B8E58@ericsson.com>
From: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 19:52:33 +0900
Message-ID: <CAPK2DeyysCeF-m7vv-adUo=Frzs-crN7PcC6EKeJpWT6-vk98Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>
Cc: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>, Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>, Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>, CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>, "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>, Chris Shen <shenyiwen7@gmail.com>, skku-iotlab-members <skku-iotlab-members@googlegroups.com>, "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fc8ee905dfd3e004"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/mT6ARlIO397HPMBf_cN13nxccOQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 25 May 2022 04:06:12 -0700
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-28: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 10:53:11 -0000

Hi Zahed,
According to your comment, I will change the last sentence in the Abstract
of
the revision of this document as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- OLD:
Next, for IPv6-based vehicular networks, it makes a gap analysis of current
IPv6 protocols (e.g., IPv6 Neighbor Discovery, Mobility Management,
and Security & Privacy), and then enumerates gaps for the extensions
of those IPv6 protocols for IPv6-based vehicular networking.

- NEW:
Next, for IPv6-based vehicular networks, it makes a gap analysis of current
IPv6 protocols (e.g., IPv6 Neighbor Discovery, Mobility Management,
and Security & Privacy).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Paul

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:54 PM Zaheduzzaman Sarker <
zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks for addressing my comments.
>
> I think all of those looks nice. However, the changes in abstract still
> does not seems right. This part - “enumerates gaps for the extensions of
> those
> IPv6 protocols” seems still unnecessary and does not add any extra
> information to the term “gap analysis”
>
> //Zahed
>
> On 19 May 2022, at 21:31, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> <Revision-Letter-on-IPWAVE-PS-Document-29-2022-05-19-v1.pdf>
>
>
>