Re: [Json] Comments on proposed charter for JSON

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 01 March 2013 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BA521E8099 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 05:49:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BqrfDcssJOBn for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 05:49:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-f176.google.com (mail-ve0-f176.google.com [209.85.128.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E0221F90C0 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 05:49:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f176.google.com with SMTP id cz10so2839566veb.7 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 05:49:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aIZMuGzQE3VppfxRJ3xojUggy6U4t/YRS05lGLSXwQg=; b=yvKdY9yoyLPN1WoGAFnd1Sn7jlyAEF6bxm1AInyPZQkWW00ZuvwWNfDopRbneCWlVz gPJWujJRBfC42pf4HOnAQ41nouiSY/YXMJxBraoaVYMHvgeIaaCLN/db2DP8TTUzNJhn uNWVDi2N3kM7xJ0xQav3M1RVRDtAfxLX3ve2t8mV8glMD4Ed1gOUx8KgjDTISW0mv0XC w6KEjm4RyMhH9QAzG358FTgNDGD04utTFBO971ab8krRQWIKqD+PftDwvVaJoQSS5DPP Kakfwe1ImQe4ww/PuSivLNQnDrLQkkOzVTVQWBdP228DWIsPNtAsXieED38gkmSymeHB 0pkA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.24.229 with SMTP id x5mr3529244vdf.84.1362145770791; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 05:49:30 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.59.3.41 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 05:49:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130228170825.09fcfa20@elandnews.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130228170825.09fcfa20@elandnews.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:49:30 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Zv9Hlg6v-FDRcvv6ZawCOEDfyNE
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVCWPp1LA_NCqdzpRetPbsoZ=fBb0APWr8=MoJqe8RxkTQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: json@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Json] Comments on proposed charter for JSON
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 13:49:32 -0000

> I suggest against having an initial list.  It's difficult to predict whether
> people will have the energy to review once the charter has been approved.

Specifically, then, you suggest that there be only the one item: make
4627 Standards Track?  And then require recharter to add any other
items, which would be listed as individual work items in any recharter
proposal?

Barry