IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title

R S <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 22 June 2013 02:33 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6CD21E809E for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KVD5lShfcluY for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2299C21E804D for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e11so7060325wgh.30 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rsr+PB4HX7OCjhQFXGcobev6kPh+PyBQ1DpA3dyDPjg=; b=T64FlsdMVkez+Jy1eeWZTuieeNwO2PhrYIHUKxmfE5ketOOggeXFMsJ/1Q8Y1MAeZs 3cFPLQoyFtNdzFJFjD1dNqZwBo9+sihp4gk5icFaa4RUMMj6cQeJ8c9ACobxGOZ01Edk 7y1vkC3jhwBLaCnx046BluRACM6dz8B56AseIuabn+QyH6a10gYc340eJuDB+5m4Q0Jb Q1dPVH17rKoSK1k4CZ93zhYENtyoz3lqJ6XwpzRyVi20CPiK8/ZbPVs9epsswlmGHcBO 7iq9PiS4pInJM92oBqBQfPtlW9bAUk5tysxs/nx8GrtKy00NwkR3tv/OS7qMZLk2hx7g bPrA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.76.103 with SMTP id j7mr585123wiw.21.1371868386096; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.44.138 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <90B659B8-D4AC-41AF-8C06-67FC65C8BD74@vpnc.org>
References: <90B659B8-D4AC-41AF-8C06-67FC65C8BD74@vpnc.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:33:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SyvgVHZUSvS+QOrFu1OxaKCUdEgRBdjw6rrsseQw4c0tQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: R S <sayrer@gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d043c7cc6d4fe6404dfb4ff66"
Cc: JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 02:33:09 -0000

1, 0

(a refreshing change from "+1" emails...)

- Rob


On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> There are three proposals for dealing with the document title:
>   0) Leave the title in the current draft as-is:
>        The application/json Media Type for JavaScript Object Notation
> (JSON)
>   1) Change the title to
>        The JSON Data Interchange Format
>   2) Change the title to
>        The JSON Format for Encoding Data
>
> Please respond to this message with a list of proposals you could accept,
> ordered from highest to lowest. Do not list proposals you cannot live with.
> If you cannot accept any of the proposals, please respond and say why.
>
> Based on the responses we receive, we will try to judge the consensus of
> the WG.
>
> -- The JSON WG co-chairs
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email