IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] The text in draft-ietf-json-text-sequence

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 08 July 2014 11:55 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E601B2A58 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 04:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KYXbgord2xvJ for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 04:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60EBF1B278B for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 04:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s68BtO6l023991; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 13:55:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (reingewinn.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.218.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD5235E7; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 13:55:23 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <FD9026FF-BDC5-451C-ABBC-0608AB63B819@vpnc.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 13:55:23 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 426513322.976739-dc799b406f170e0e01eba031919a7eee
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <08517507-216D-4C43-8DE8-AC82CC8A8DEE@tzi.org>
References: <FD9026FF-BDC5-451C-ABBC-0608AB63B819@vpnc.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/clmZDutvHFKTwEoDstW-LIrB88s
Cc: IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] The text in draft-ietf-json-text-sequence
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 11:55:35 -0000

On 07 Jul 2014, at 22:57, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> - Do you feel that the protocol will be significantly broken if it uses LF as the text separator?

Yes.  [if “not very useful” counts as “broken"]

> - Do you feel that the protocol will be significantly broken if it uses RS as the text separator?

No.

> - Do you feel that using LF or RF as the text separator is essentially the same for the protocol?

No.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email