IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] [saag] AD sponsoring draft-hansen-scram-sha256

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 16 February 2015 11:10 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05BE91A876E; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 03:10:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MQuxtGz1mgH9; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 03:10:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (ext-bt.isode.com [217.34.220.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3044A1A8794; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 03:10:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1424085006; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=H2M622mg5Pj/fBD/ED7nkJsBaHoEU2Zj4EztCeOSPKg=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=JFgBTqFpbCCBnUuEJcTlTPsZdm2TS6HzzndlOjyFEgAQ+wH5Z2OOo0kk2N2ggjd6jvNnk3 iEgrUiq1Irg5jhoeqlMJn3L5v70exejMcE3ZCuR6eyR4BF5rOmncLCuzuMvtoF9/0kLv+l CUnJQB/qKRnvprZ+AxJWPEuiyfA7AEs=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <VOHQCwBB7Vgg@waldorf.isode.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:10:06 +0000
Message-ID: <54E1D009.2050408@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:10:01 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
To: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <54DC00D0.2050900@cs.tcd.ie> <87r3tqqj9y.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
In-Reply-To: <87r3tqqj9y.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/AGNOPlhJ0x102QhfyXNAbgf9EGU>
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>, "http-auth@ietf.org" <http-auth@ietf.org>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [kitten] [saag] AD sponsoring draft-hansen-scram-sha256
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:10:22 -0000

Hi Simon,

On 16/02/2015 09:48, Simon Josefsson wrote:
  [snip]
> A suggested (not even mandated) pbkdf iteration count of at least 4096
> is unchanged since RFC 5802 -- I'd really like to see that be
> significantly higher.  Back in 2000 an iteration count of 1000 was
> recommended as the minimum.  Surely computational power has increased
> more than a factor of four since then.
I've heard complains from developers that 4096 with SHA-1 is too high 
for current Android phones. It would be good to get more information on 
performance before changing the number.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email