Re: MOGGIES Proposed Charter<

Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com> Fri, 21 May 2010 21:54 UTC

Return-Path: <mrex@sap.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758E33A67F6; Fri, 21 May 2010 14:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.098, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yHaHPqip-3Ib; Fri, 21 May 2010 14:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpde03.sap-ag.de (smtpde02.sap-ag.de [155.56.68.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656C73A659A; Fri, 21 May 2010 14:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sap.corp by smtpde03.sap-ag.de (26) with ESMTP id o4LKBDNQ020669 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 21 May 2010 22:11:13 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from fs4113.wdf.sap.corp (fs4113.wdf.sap.corp [10.21.76.84]) by mail.sap.corp (mail03-25) with ESMTP id o4LKBCuA006580 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 21 May 2010 22:11:13 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from d019080@localhost) by fs4113.wdf.sap.corp (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4/Submit) id o4LKBBFk012803; Fri, 21 May 2010 22:11:11 +0200 (MEST)
From: Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com>
Message-Id: <201005212011.o4LKBBFk012803@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
Subject: Re: MOGGIES Proposed Charter<
To: simon@josefsson.org (Simon Josefsson)
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 22:11:11 +0200 (MEST)
In-Reply-To: <878w7gv1v4.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> from "Simon Josefsson" at May 19, 10 08:31:43 am
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Scanner: Virus Scanner virwal06
X-SAP: out
Cc: kitten@ietf.org, tim.polk@nist.gov, sasl@ietf.org, jhutz@cmu.edu
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mrex@sap.com
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 21:54:38 -0000

Simon Josefsson wrote:
> 
> Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> writes:
> >
> > <Nicolas.Williams@oracle.com> wrote:
> > >   [..."MOGGIES"...]
> > >
> > > I don't love the name (I keep thinking "MOOGIES", which sounds like
> > > something gross :), but I'll live; I have no better suggestions.
> >
> > I don't even _understand_ the name.  Or the expansion.
> > Can't we have something that doesn't make me (and anyone not already
> > familiar with what we're working on) go "Huh?" ?

I had to look up the term MOGGIES in a dictionary.

The meaning of the expansion appears a little weird/non-intuitive to me.

> 
> I would prefer something self-explanatory, like SASLGSS.

Do we need to rename Kitten at all?

How about "KittenS" ?

-Martin