Re: [ldapext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-stroeder-mailboxrelatedobject-06.txt

Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com> Mon, 06 October 2014 07:04 UTC

Return-Path: <michael@stroeder.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2161A1B40 for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 00:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cVscuJ-YwNxl for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 00:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srv1.stroeder.com (srv1.stroeder.com [213.240.180.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12E231A1A30 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 00:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by srv1.stroeder.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6F060396; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:04:35 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at stroeder.com
Received: from srv1.stroeder.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv1.stroeder.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53PCgyt7YqKP; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:04:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.1.0.2] (unknown [10.1.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "michael@stroeder.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Client CA" (verified OK)) by srv1.stroeder.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36E9F602AD; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 07:04:31 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <54323EFE.9060008@stroeder.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:04:30 +0200
From: =?windows-1252?Q?Michael_Str=F6der?= <michael@stroeder.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>, ldapext@ietf.org
References: <20140926115934.25447.2865.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <542558EB.4000709@stroeder.com> <5425848B.3040504@seantek.com> <54258E77.4010004@stroeder.com> <54258F68.7010109@stroeder.com> <54314F09.6080408@seantek.com> <5431B5BE.9030103@stroeder.com> <5431BDBA.70506@seantek.com>
In-Reply-To: <5431BDBA.70506@seantek.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms000203090209060602070606"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/6sTdNsuuwel0uTw1Ocp6Dt2ULQM
Subject: Re: [ldapext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-stroeder-mailboxrelatedobject-06.txt
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 07:04:46 -0000

Sean Leonard wrote:
> On 10/5/2014 2:18 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
>> Sean Leonard wrote:
>>> On 9/26/2014 9:08 AM, Michael Ströder wrote:
>>>> Michael Ströder wrote:
>>>>> Personally I consider PKCS#9 to be seriously flawed. E.g. defining as
>>>>> GeneralizedTime is bad design. Yuck!
>>>> Should have been: "defining dateOfBirth as GeneralizedTime"
>>>>                           ^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> Hi Michael, I just wanted to follow up on this. What exactly is the problem
>>> with GeneralizedTime?
>> There's no real semantics using a time part for dateOfBirth and matching will
>> be incorrect.
>>
>> Furthermore I'm strongly against arbitrarily using zeroed time in case of
>> unknown birth time.
> 
> Well what can I say.

We should better discuss that in a followup to your message announcing
draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-00.txt.

Ciao, Michael.