Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-10
Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org> Fri, 07 September 2012 00:43 UTC
Return-Path: <terry.manderson@icann.org>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9979421F84C8; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XfsO7jXKXtzV; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org (expfe100-2.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.237]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D15D21F849A; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.237]) with mapi; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:43:34 -0700
From: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
To: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:43:31 -0700
Thread-Topic: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-10
Thread-Index: Ac2MN+93uvNS61ZOShe1mmHwXkYGpgAWd4Sx
Message-ID: <CC6F8053.2A077%terry.manderson@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <201209061355.q86Dtuh27671@magenta.juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3429859411_75211349"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-10
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:43:35 -0000
Hi Yakov, I disagree with you that it describes its use for L2VPN. It provides the ability to use a MAC as an EID. There are no normative verbs used, and noting the experimental nature of the draft I must admit that I am struggling to see the basis for your objection given that the LCAF draft is an underlying modification to the LISP control messages (in that it does fall in the mandate of the charter). Putting on my 'research advocacy' hat, and highlighting that all of the protocol documents issued by LISP are chartered to be experimental, I feel perfectly comfortable having the documents from the LISP experiment not shy away from the existence of, or the possibility of, encapsulating other address formats. I will draw a line the minute the LISP WG attempts to impose or change behaviors on the documented work from another chartered WG, and will happily direct (as written in the charter) any such work to the appropriate WG. Cheers Terry On 6/09/12 11:55 PM, "Yakov Rekhter" <yakov@juniper.net> wrote: > Terry, > >> I view that there is consensus in the workgroup to adopt this draft as a >> work group item. >> >> Can the authors please submit a revision in the appropriate fashion. >> >> I'd also like to remind the authors that as a WG document I am expecting >> that any substantive document changes are the result of WG discussion. >> >> I would also like to call the WG's attention to the comments regarding code >> points for transport of other protocols and ask the WG to consider those >> comments in the process of developing this draft. > > I note that you have called consensus to adopt draft-farinacci- > lisp-lcaf as a LISP working group document. This document describes > its use for L2VPN. Could you please explain where this is covered > in the current LISP working group charter. > > Yakov.
- [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-lisp-… Terry Manderson
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Damien Saucez
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Florin Coras
- Re: [lisp] [MARKETING] Call for adoption of draft… Gregg Schudel
- Re: [lisp] [MARKETING] Call for adoption of draft… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] [MARKETING] Call for adoption of draft… Vince Fuller
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Michael Hoefling
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Job Snijders
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Michael Kowal (mikowal)
- Re: [lisp] [MARKETING] Call for adoption of draft… Fabio Maino
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… John G. Scudder
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Noel Chiappa
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Terry Manderson
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Yakov Rekhter
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Noel Chiappa
- Re: [lisp] [MARKETING] Call for adoption of draft… Victor Moreno (vimoreno)
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Terry Manderson
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Yakov Rekhter
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Terry Manderson
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Ross Callon
- Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-l… Joel M. Halpern