IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-10

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Mon, 13 August 2012 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72A221F86F6 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.06
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.06 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kwySKfWWbXmu for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754F721F86F2 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 5EF7318C0E8; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:25:31 -0400 (EDT)
To: lisp@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20120813222531.5EF7318C0E8@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:25:31 -0400
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-10
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 22:25:33 -0000

    > From: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>

    > The draft documents, among other things, use of LISP for l3vpn (S. 4.1)
    > and l2vpn (S. 4.12.2). N either of these appear related to the WG charter

Those are just two minor uses - what about all the other ones?

Anyway, do you have a better suggestion for a WG to use to define a core LISP
namespace?

	Noel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email