IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Wireguard and LISP [Was: Virtual meeting]

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Tue, 24 March 2020 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005E93A0C53 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3u1by7m5JuOG for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F21223A0C36 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id s23so616878plq.13 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=EA9WfU3VR2VGBV8BuodxBpz/IqbCQm+283F1WjkS7dU=; b=a7IRlaRfNPZnZgSIXfWYWxq14Naet2cpkLm3cQr7rHyeLv0xh45GsLaWujO48I1Fey HFIHlS8/mce/FAdEncTddS+GPVZt7qZbKq9O5WOiJjh2x1T+2tqIgGwrbctXla/4k+6t tBRrXm4zGSDOFBBsZQIrh6o48eVfEh0g9N3IDl/oE+WO4eGWYMUanUG6Zi4IS97k1PIV 9kxI23KH9jzUElMkWMDC2l9jLKMi5GoR4Nb0N0XTEekvpmHIlEjeA8RCCPnd7p309SjY iQ2t2cUnjoi04L2sh0KeG3o4qwyU6VRxW1W+weRR8hbRCbjpznTX6owi+7TXsW3fBFHU 9haQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=EA9WfU3VR2VGBV8BuodxBpz/IqbCQm+283F1WjkS7dU=; b=AW3WYXLYYyCul1Y3l0PcuClx/fjWWdmlTn3BxIvbQCW9JdFIJZAbjULD8j41T2Uk4u bqdlkeuQbLX/pKOnCzV9Zv/oEJhT8TQKVoyutXMAthBGqL26Dn+FxJE5GoysoPpvGKwn 1SqBz65SVGj1O/jZs/XHZek/XY1gP3dFyP+hWuwdGgDhm2eAVvfbpIlQ3Ss/OvrB9Fo9 b0lMkhBrLABE8sWy4NhGuANYK9QjwyMdGEiaU+dZPOksZITPmYV830dq1rGNOYjaVHT2 FGaWGjuCgeNtc0GYZhc89jyhdYHPxEdu3DiUq2IkwqVQrdkX4Kzom2gvsd6VMyv1VvOe I7gg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2cQ7XlOXnDR4EFIePMXi9uUROq5lMXGpORpnWU9h4Z9HPwb/L1 /lYW4SKa2s3jVzPuesjcqxQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs0bo9wYG4MFt5lvS4napauHwXyluszGDB3KH/3cgiId4sp79e95ZbBw+BG2i8sE8s9E/FDpw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2dc2:: with SMTP id q2mr6682546pjm.146.1585071164367; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:9600:af10:91fb:61ca:206e:cb6e? ([2601:646:9600:af10:91fb:61ca:206e:cb6e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t3sm10028298pfl.26.2020.03.24.10.32.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8A1B78BF-7677-4D8B-9D9B-0741BD037F46@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:32:42 -0700
Cc: Albert Cabellos <albert.cabellos@gmail.com>, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6E6DACF7-0FBB-48E6-B432-3413646EC3D6@gmail.com>
References: <95B658E8-B629-4E44-AB99-E9E406D11FF1@cisco.com> <39E32C9F-28FF-44B4-BE28-255199CEC968@gmail.com> <8A1B78BF-7677-4D8B-9D9B-0741BD037F46@cisco.com>
To: "Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole)" <mportole@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/2_QtMScqI3QC5MjIclCLGBu6ajY>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Wireguard and LISP [Was: Virtual meeting]
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:32:46 -0000

> Do you mean using lisp encapsulation as part of the encrypted payload? Or as an alternative to the wireguard header?

The former.

> The wireguard whitepaper seems to establish the dataplane header very specifically, but since it seems to assume that the payload is an ip packet, a lisp packet could work there.
> 
> Thanks,
> Marc

Right.

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email