IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Virtual meeting

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Tue, 10 March 2020 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B54C3A0EEE for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VDfM1qH4yeC4 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 429453A0EAF for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cTRr0wCPz6G846; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1583877352; bh=BsZShxQDAYQsw0fXd3vpUuNuIuBftP4yoNnmnNguIW4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=mfarWPHmWTDQPtWOrKUqLjfhNIs/Ev3/hhCSvVWB2IBnSzN1O6PDpda71CKMrf+J8 Nl1qq+Qlracq+V4GFj8QoYXw89JAJ5YKF7u7dxGGraR7oE55JWV2hZohBdsKbCBGww QevWEieny14GUQ5D+7gIDDsxd5g7JTS0H2KsSn40=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.128.43] (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48cTRq4dScz6G83y; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
References: <bf751274-3d10-4675-40ff-0876b968ec58@joelhalpern.com> <EB8728FF-8299-4915-81C0-7A414E1A1735@gmail.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <b2bf2e7c-9535-e6b2-51ff-dc922c875fb7@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:55:49 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <EB8728FF-8299-4915-81C0-7A414E1A1735@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/x0_5bV2ysxgfBScWB75xYY_zzqI>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Virtual meeting
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:56:01 -0000

Many of the things that I believe folks would like to discuss are in 
charter.
Dino, I think you misunderstood my point.
I am looking to see discussion on the list to give me confidence that a 
virtual session will be useful.  I have been disappointed in the one-way 
nature of the last several working group meetings, and do not wish to 
waste a virtual meeting on such.

Sure, we are not going to be able to last-call things yet.  But we can 
get them ready for IETF LC.  (Whether we hold a WG LC or defer that 
probably depends upon whether there is dependency on the currently 
blocking comments for PS publication.)

Yours,
Joel

On 3/10/2020 5:50 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>> I understand that folks want to present their work.
>> But what I am looking for if we are going to get folks together is actual engagement on the list.  Indication that there are things worth discussing.
> 
> There are things worth discussing if we can discuss non-RFCbis material. There are many working group documents ready for last call but consensus wants to hold them until RFCbis documents are in RFC. Since that is taking a bit long, we are seeing delays unfortunately.
> 
> But more importantly, if people want to discuss, people should attend virtually. I will attend virtually when it is decided to have the virtual meeting.
> 
> Dino
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email