IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Virtual meeting

Joel Halpern Direct <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com> Mon, 16 March 2020 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE053A0EC7 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VgHjn3uYmSQH for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE72C3A0EBF for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48h4Sk5cpjz6GH0L; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1584383046; bh=te1ZbL7yVWsx9TNn3Hgu+HU21IwJsmskhG9JcOglTSM=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=I445r9enPqTz+Nb84tiB9bGG0el9v2pM72bW7xNLMOrix5DwmRfhsII+CsbXJ6TJT Lb9zSf32HhcPte4bTBaxRGTOIvuORi5VPW9lxmnKMvTLITBFXNrqeFOgbrVpUd4eq2 u/EZg/ClfFMKzhPxLZSou9HJfSlx+8nwYZkdT71I=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.128.43] (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48h4Sk1p95z6GH0G; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Alberto Rodriguez Natal (natal)" <natal@cisco.com>
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
References: <bf751274-3d10-4675-40ff-0876b968ec58@joelhalpern.com> <EB8728FF-8299-4915-81C0-7A414E1A1735@gmail.com> <b2bf2e7c-9535-e6b2-51ff-dc922c875fb7@joelhalpern.com> <F0929D9F-2726-48AF-90E0-9242A5898F4C@gmail.com> <e995cd58-3504-c7b4-a970-f55550e3829b@joelhalpern.com> <0310FDA2-6AE2-472B-82A7-D38039F64DDB@cisco.com>
From: Joel Halpern Direct <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <293fbb16-75c4-bb79-e183-eaf781b696e3@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:24:04 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0310FDA2-6AE2-472B-82A7-D38039F64DDB@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/l7H4baG3iZrjjXplT3I0EqHYifc>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Virtual meeting
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:24:09 -0000

Thank you Alberto.  To see if folks want to engage on the topic, could 
you write a short email describing the question and, if you can, some of 
the things that you would like to discuss?

Folks, let's be clear.  I do expect we will have a virtual interim. 
Maybe even more than one.  I would really like to see groundwork on the 
email list so that any request by the chairs for folks to make time is 
for more than just some presentations.

Thank you,
Joel

On 3/16/2020 2:15 PM, Alberto Rodriguez Natal (natal) wrote:
> Joel, all,
> 
> I'm in favor of having a virtual interim meeting. One of the points that I have on my personal list of "things to discuss when we have time" is the aspect of (unsolicited) Map-Notifies on PubSub. I think it can benefit from some deeper discussion with the WG regarding, nonces, security associations, ITR-MS relationship, etc. If the WG is up to it, I can bring the topic for discussion and get some opinions on an interim.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alberto
>      
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email