IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Wireguard and LISP [Was: Virtual meeting]

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Tue, 24 March 2020 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0FE43A0890 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 07:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GeiB_FiwdGWa for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 07:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDA853A088C for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 07:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id a23so7493707plm.1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 07:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Uzs8ptBk8IB/9IQ+6ZT6sSKKNUdz68D1juICwXTM9Ts=; b=aatMwNOc6+q8xPcj6Jfyi4Rc6ozgrsAFcYhhF9V+OInpK2bqZw3ATY1tKdmuw5WZfs QB4QMP26T6C9RWmD3wvum91I4eQY4pGkw5YLPGIh9DvwshG9P80Radv8HrWhtg6JPCfx EUEBVht7YuZ8cQ4eq4R6JNYEAvr/yG2Pg6YVwFmPdMgriXBBNHPljQJxa4t4Xd7gRAcs LG2i+K0cwb8pH+TKhw/CgEUYJueXkybk1RSGgEbtW/iSaxnQHV7B6RP7rXiiREODOxG4 mbmGPu80fqRbqYQ+Z1J/9bH2QxIOyrDf2NXJv1m8c8cXRE9D++6A6ceDuHGKvG/zfqB6 r/RA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Uzs8ptBk8IB/9IQ+6ZT6sSKKNUdz68D1juICwXTM9Ts=; b=aMP6SJvAB1vxSEm6l+4YF3teFqvyvfErvY1Ob5e2o5GkbLfKDD/b4VEzQ8793MeVm/ i6WTkReZlYXZfA9gWUHOgTU99m6+Vv1zFGWvn+kM8IU643ujkodHuTsdWhwvqX1Dku9i d20w8zop9kZ/8SAYg6cq8z5ckCIp6xSiV86mIkF8PmltitR/x496UrmZ7KapUD//p8gh uEGmJQ5uBA8brthP7R4NhTONzKS01F9mQncG2uIr17QDUpLZaRSxibYUI2Ujz5JE6eqh zAOKaYU2S0a4Gg5wQWaHqckmFXeilBMVu9p1gW81LJOI7zNFlVWtrdmNMSxLu042U+8N FceQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1BLBMk8UiHWD9HX+z6JEkeDTi2r2KAsLOE5Y4rzaVKAnFPl5dK 2vuzeR48qGqM63+LjTzykGFViPg4doI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuhNujwMuaBVxNwYsEEmu5e8+ZcJ+dCMmspJS/7px9fKEZJWVIN/4D4K3b3nC1ybaeu+Dgy2g==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d68a:: with SMTP id v10mr6765849ply.130.1585061586035; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 07:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:9600:af10:c891:67ba:71f7:33c4? ([2601:646:9600:af10:c891:67ba:71f7:33c4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g18sm10062715pgh.42.2020.03.24.07.53.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 07:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 07:53:03 -0700
Message-Id: <39E32C9F-28FF-44B4-BE28-255199CEC968@gmail.com>
References: <95B658E8-B629-4E44-AB99-E9E406D11FF1@cisco.com>
Cc: Albert Cabellos <albert.cabellos@gmail.com>, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <95B658E8-B629-4E44-AB99-E9E406D11FF1@cisco.com>
To: "Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole)" <mportole@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17E255)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/7H3BVuX08s2ENXuo0LYgrKmnuPI>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Wireguard and LISP [Was: Virtual meeting]
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:53:09 -0000

Marc,

> On Mar 23, 2020, at 9:27 PM, Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole) <mportole@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Have you given any thought to supporting segmentation when using wireguard encapsulation in the  dataplane? Could the Receiver field in the wireguard header be used for that and linked somehow to LISP IIDs?

Well since Wireguard can support multiple encapsulations, it could add support for LISP encapsulation fairly easy. And then they get segmentation with it and it can map its style of VPNs to draft-ietf-lisp-vpn. 

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email