[lisp] Draft LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases

Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 18 April 2024 06:59 UTC

Return-Path: <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C4EC151539; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 23:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-FHAF5sfyGy; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 23:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x233.google.com (mail-lj1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 616D9C151089; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 23:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x233.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2dae975d0dcso16721361fa.1; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 23:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713423584; x=1714028384; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Da74RNN8VMmrWhYHe/nms6rECg+1sGhUQmy3nQySW4Y=; b=FM6l6yHyFBbVRfoZ+5t5dVEHiI9pHlbEZRK9DRum/zsyI9cXm+hVEmpQcKyVfP3jUk QPn8Qx1jGYNXnPLrzMBlhlkHDz59hZLBxAVC6hcjvDhkIYCGBL3XNHFgYQMXgOWay6cy Rx+wakbtXJcSAfc5qcwgEcwnD2NjZwr6eHgee/xABpNb5mIPLL5KOCnovDub9HHjbHr7 3JmaTHfO8gk9i81YczxaZuyrtiVv1P1GKftvtPK8Eh7J4Y6cyD3eMi4UCO54Zb+guSfm xGIQFZ5IBVFKgK0QgNPkjwEl9KHNxt76HM8p9PNAUVnEtdk4kbbgfW0M2ODsEwjJU854 DvcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713423584; x=1714028384; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Da74RNN8VMmrWhYHe/nms6rECg+1sGhUQmy3nQySW4Y=; b=dixEPDIRTugwoj6M3Xj/dqHy7eMM2DmA72sprQi93eDjxX2e7ZHp1o4+vFoTIOwin6 Ir3BHT7Cej+omipQldXLoZ5dS22sGUDczADkOQ1fip+h3HztC0rxARi6GFBsteWBvJSd F79tF0LT/B8FJXishv0Okw9LadD+UAnGOwIrNuRMcUKtAni/8ikuf/W89za3U7nfADiw +o5vpGU4s0yYHoVIWauh5BS0CDD834qBAjEYxsDNnF+wskO1FqLQfD67UIEs61hZELly Ae6werYj1CAM2wm4Gk7Hf/OGoMN1npoNkxU55S2AXYx6BNbDy593ZyzT1iDH5tbkNo8f N6Tw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVSonS2yqHU8Z2O4wWZTWmytLOf1c+ykk3LQJyLoOoIPPXLMKN/v+8bcEx8FXAmR+obumIIl7xgPu7Px76/
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyc8kTgLZFfVmSwTMmqWP1GalacJudiTEaAO+6t/KfmKI7MuS5C GwGJC2v4McA6jr8Aa1iu0LdqiqcsyvO8Uor2v9ehBqT9bURQKPpbRMVa+h8tT+q9dgor9oRi7ot ldNw1VVCbDcG1JjG5oaWbr218QlM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGFDQ1lnsb9z5lomTncuACHkOxWasGXM35OetcomM2eJZcukedhQMw0RjWu+90x2WHHH4CvIgBAyXxzcHc92lg=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a383:0:b0:2d7:11:6793 with SMTP id r3-20020a2ea383000000b002d700116793mr359221lje.7.1713423583562; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 23:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 23:59:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG-CQxorT7AKP1mAUE-0kk8B4si+gRCj-w_=jZ=y_SH=QWCy7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, "Alberto Rodriguez Natal (natal)" <natal@cisco.com>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000c53ce0616598457"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/LxCSBBkSjyXId4YmGSEl8uwlOD4>
Subject: [lisp] Draft LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 06:59:50 -0000

Hello Dino and Alberto

The  Yang Doctor review had comments on Yang -20 draft regarding the
geoloc.
For reference comment from Joe Clark

As to the two questions asked here, I can see some benefit of breaking
out the IANA parts of address-types into a module that they maintain.
But in its current form, I don't know that it makes sense to have them
maintain it.  As for geoloc, I do see some overlap, but I am not a
LISP expert at all, so I cannot comment as to whether bringing that
whole module in makes sense or would even work with LISP
implementations.  That is, it seems LISP lat and long are expressed in
degreesĀ° minutes'seconds" whereas geoloc does this as a decimal64 from
a reference frame.  I do feel that whatever direction is taken, text
explaining why geoloc is not used is useful.


Per Med's comment on groupings -
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/lJ7jBJzjJNY2P4sQgCcLuSnnzds/

Consolidating these comments in a single thread here for resolution and
discussion on the list before the refresh,

Thanks
Padma and Luigi