Re: [lp-wan] overview draft with some text...

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hiya,

On 29/10/16 23:44, Juan Carlos Zuniga wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Thanks for posting the draft!
> 
> I noticed that the goal of supporting common IP services on these
> LPWAN technologies is mentioned in the abstract and in the intro.
> However, the document focuses on differences and gaps and does not
> say much about common goals. Perhaps we should also add some text
> about the shared goals for all LPWAN technologies, which according to
> the charter would include the definition of common 1) management
> features, 2) security features, and 3) application profiles.

Yeah, some of that is coming from the "gaps" document. More will
likely have to wait for further revisions of the draft.

> 
> Also, I've recently posted a revision of the sigfox draft to update
> some figures that were mentioned in July. Since we are saying "as of
> today" in section 4.3.1 of draft-farrell-lpwan-overview-01, could you
> please update the second paragraph with the figures in:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zuniga-lpwan-sigfox-system-description-01#section-7
> 

Sure. Happy to fix. Feel free to do that via PR to the git repo if
that's easier. Is it?

Cheers,
S.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Juan Carlos
> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: lp-wan
>> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell Sent:
>> October 29, 2016 1:57 AM To: [e-mail] Subject: [lp-wan]
>> overview draft with some text...
>> 
>> 
>> Hiya,
>> 
>> I've incorporated descriptive text about some of the "input"
>> technologies for lpwan in -01 of the overview draft. [1] That
>> includes text from a lora draft that Alper and I also posted
>> recently [2] and from the existing sigfox and nb- iot drafts. Next
>> up will be adding text from the gap analysis work in the places
>> indicated. I hope to post that before the cutoff. We may also get
>> text on WI-SUN by then too.
>> 
>> Comments on any inaccuracies or omissions in [1] are of course
>> very welcome. There's a github repo [3] if anyone prefers that.
>> (Though my github foo is modest so bear with me if taking that
>> approach:-) I'll make sure that any substantive discussion
>> initiated on github is reflected to the list.
>> 
>> Cheers, S.
>> 
>> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrell-lpwan-overview-01 [2]
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrell-lpwan-lora-overview-01 
>> [3] https://github.com/sftcd/lpwan-ov
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ lp-wan mailing list 
> [e-mail] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan
>