Re: [Lsr] problem joining interim [Re: A new version of I-D, draft-liu-lsr-isis-ifit-node-capability-02]

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 03 April 2020 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741793A0414 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 12:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ejUyiQxuTH6 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 12:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B28063A03FA for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 12:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id z3so3355005pjr.4 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 12:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=jESPkclBtBF5V4VmoasffXixYl2NYHhqnRjIdaolAGY=; b=fXLKUEjn4M9DdkqfVFYr91yHSHx6cv7spgqtpahAr159MQvI4JJ7tVEfulOYmLsTKR hMc7Y7BrXFr/gBrdp/9qtHkrnOCjkcXch9XMPevI6tR1KjPB6Hcqnx5nwmcQcVfLnYSL SgCCsMpx+KlThnAHVlS0eZUb8THB8q9PncPpjewXDh0EHeasJteUXRTmfYnkeTHz+0yZ qR457mUdlOxzUU3G4mczYvE/2oJSSJh4ufdyVxKP/Ea8u1TkYqENRwV3Ly6v6o2wfUqt 6MHtXzFEyCSNNq5XenGjg0XP9sp7JuhgaAn471Karm6vfKfgLYFKiLNzwK2BIdCusvvX 1v+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=jESPkclBtBF5V4VmoasffXixYl2NYHhqnRjIdaolAGY=; b=QnCdzI2IEKzIcClZ2yRkycb1tffMxd7cRD2R8Q7S1WNObldPHyj/ayK/klJOoVo7XL yLUH6OJDGF7qDU4Gt4S5GDO/nq1L6LYB7dJqx95ITgtVJRAFeO70MZCZ7PPvJ0s/METF OuKB8K7IT2rtBcqd6A0iCHtluAwm6f2Ord7skuHRRZG8H0w/v29Q7Pic+VX8XpaatUr4 EyXMlx0NvFuSdYsn28cJB2eq+OLEwao7BICzTZ7y4vb4ius6rjaqSzYUApEth4AnQUdX VgCK0Ya6GR+EXYJa2/YkVGJsz2VsW0pUip3orsm+fU9mKKg01Uwh3Jm2+TqYG71ae/82 Stfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubSvwh+tEoLCVrt+9METzjvPAV1iCJO70v/ZTdxZLKZBIr6NTwn 4pK6oAb7BC9w6ndbfhPV0hE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJP13Ukf3LDox9FcWOlJsL8ejv3LO1OwZg9dgzI0M8zqpx4iX1iZRE/v/cF6EsCNNcuC9tc2A==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:22e:: with SMTP id 43mr8859839plc.119.1585940831786; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 12:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.10] (c-73-63-232-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.63.232.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w127sm6312342pfw.218.2020.04.03.12.07.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Apr 2020 12:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-9BF4A325-7763-48D0-8CA0-868621291C5A"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 12:07:09 -0700
Message-Id: <34B769E5-9A35-4E79-A800-4771643A9C92@gmail.com>
References: <1713f9f0f68.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
Cc: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, lsr@ietf.org, Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, wangyali <wangyali11@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <1713f9f0f68.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17E255)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/4DGUmIZ9kX3Ym_ZdRsi2Zp57X0o>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] problem joining interim [Re: A new version of I-D, draft-liu-lsr-isis-ifit-node-capability-02]
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 19:08:31 -0000

Same here

Regards,
Jeff

> On Apr 3, 2020, at 03:38, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> Fwiw I used the link in the agenda without issue.  I did the same for RAW last week.  Also, as host of a different wg interim right before lsr, I didn't have to do anything to let people in to the session - they just showed up....
> 
> Lou
> 
>> On April 2, 2020 6:10:43 PM Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Chris,
>> 
>> I never noticed the password .... 
>> 
>> Just few days back I participated in IDR and no password was needed or perhaps webex invite link contained a token relaxing from needing one. 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> R..
>> 
>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:00 AM Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> > On Apr 2, 2020, at 5:17 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
>>> > 
>>> > Many thx,
>>> > R.
>>> > 
>>> > PS. As we are talking LSR here it is strange that joining virtual LSR meeting is not for everyone. I was waiting and tried three times today for host approval to join which was not granted. 
>>> > 
>>> 
>>> I am very sorry to hear this! We had 64 participants, at least at one point that I saw. I set the meeting up, and I don't believe there is any way to exclude anyone in particular, I certainly would never have chosen to do that.
>>> 
>>> However, Webex has a password requirement when setting up meetings (I guess, I tried to not have one, it wouldn't let me) which we included in all the details wherever the details were posted, it was "linkstate"..
>>> 
>>> I did notice an email, from webex, during the meeting about a request from Bruno to join as guest, but he was in the participant list when I then checked. I didn't receive any other emails like that (and FWIW I had 5 windows over 2 monitors going at once trying to manage all this, so noticing the 1 email was lucky).
>>> 
>>> Did it let you skip entering a password (or did it not offer the option in the first place)?
>>> 
>>> It would be good to figure this out before the next interim.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lsr mailing list
>>> Lsr@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lsr mailing list
>> Lsr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>>