Re: [Lsr] A new version of I-D, draft-liu-lsr-isis-ifit-node-capability-02

[Robert Raszuk <[e-mail]>]

> > If you consider such constrains to provide reachability for applications
> you will likely see value that in-situ telemetry is your friend here.
> Really best friend as without him you can not do the proper end to end path
> exclusion for SPT computations.
>
> [as wg member] Are you thinking that shifting traffic to a router is not
> going to affect it's jitter/drop rate?
>

Well this is actually the other way around.

First you have your default topology. They you are asked to construct new
one based on applied constrains.

So you create complete TE coverage and start running end to end data plane
probing over all TE paths (say SR-TE for specific example). Once you start
collecting the probe results you can start excluding paths which do not
meet your applied constraints. And that process continues.

To your specific question - It is not that unusual where routers degrade
their performance with time and in many cases the traffic is not the cause
for it but internal bugs and malfunctions.

Best,
R.