Re: [Lsr] problem joining interim [Re: A new version of I-D, draft-liu-lsr-isis-ifit-node-capability-02]

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 03 April 2020 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE133A16F8 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 03:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Bsev7-LIVpM for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 03:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D869F3A16F0 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 03:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id x11so6723995otp.6 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 03:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zWSstjtdSAjxzdgC9CHUOw+Zrbk8MuhQSTAnREe5e9Y=; b=AgmKjfeGL594WHhVOLQg8p78ErEIpTdhEJODfR3xoRafN8rtTBe6YYkwSmDUzen/st 8BcriILBzGqfr9Azgw7ZYE/OO/cnJqPYq7MrKN9b54bBlbFfRQMi0LTNabfNHuGp9IHT rM5Sr25p+yOcSEl4rE4Y51mQFyxforrVFguDwK0cEuohROZ1u8DVXmNRuRYVPitdM5te jgKt8IwQXPcrTtZKIdCCU0dInosU374ANswMyY4z3L5r2OFDSa4sFrSj5PpRBonfdBPU UJp9xhezNs9yeI0oWlx0ptDGxhvH6Jm0ncQoM/xEv5A4iUtA4V4AALR8XZIqSqNIxFNo aKyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zWSstjtdSAjxzdgC9CHUOw+Zrbk8MuhQSTAnREe5e9Y=; b=KTL8YG/YpvP2bW6g1L7n7Qmm6eKxSwT+xkCj3uuOcsHURvfUo/5jNQZLQr3DVcu/KG vHNJ3HwequRHkQ8yHrXKgDUGfjKSPWJrB5ocoIgJZAMhRDqZR8LIW6VXbGASe44EPd17 TnmsVjoTSCsS3og1CYFhsLds/2DvrXvS6v4tTnGfJqbChrIBgzBxvoNF/ZaD8Sv2odwP 7DjQHotMWraivJZPjfa2bEjSeBxXD10g11CUYN1duoFbh7Cl0WyUE9AK5yHZpqFsN/VK wIRYd5awU6w5lTHaKxcOZO1K7iUn1Bx99ofH/uCacCtAthjrQki7Uep274yTfl1yR8hL acqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZrvFTz5mTVZMghZgnsEoC5YNEktDLtqizabM/n2F43wKsrFMVL 87oIe1fG3HUxy1uXs9q+3VuEmX6jCCMeey8PJwo3qw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJBjSDlN21HSolp3gg3LckKsfjbupzYVxEHBd1tWCWkcLMZnfJNz4ILFvvO8LRmCkts8qqW5N0zk8UNq5WunXY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1e19:: with SMTP id s25mr5828869otr.86.1585909373665; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 03:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1520992FC97B944A9979C2FC1D7DB0F404DB1AD4@dggeml524-mbx.china.huawei.com> <MW3PR11MB4619361A2CA3A402A44914E5C1FE0@MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <1520992FC97B944A9979C2FC1D7DB0F404DB2336@dggeml524-mbx.china.huawei.com> <68249E56-5702-4C15-9748-439E43F3EB0E@chopps.org> <1520992FC97B944A9979C2FC1D7DB0F404DEFC14@dggeml524-mbx.china.huawei.com> <A937FECB-2013-403E-89B2-47971514F6CF@chopps.org> <80a8f83c76d447dda48280495b3a80a7@huawei.com> <6F0E8437-5D82-4FAC-A061-69E56E1E161D@chopps.org> <2189e17f36764960bf2dcc554cde9ce0@huawei.com> <MW3PR11MB4619925BEF83B0C4512DD284C1C90@MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <06e8443210924ac788c40fa15972cbdd@huawei.com> <C987B657-64D1-4C70-B471-ED9F1266B990@cisco.com> <3948044C-0CC9-4AE8-8541-4D23A5DF396E@cisco.com> <1520992FC97B944A9979C2FC1D7DB0F404DF089E@dggeml524-mbx.china.huawei.com> <MW3PR11MB46197F8C43B3200B07641838C1C60@MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMGsVkws0sTw4RRdb_SdWvsuh+2Dxc-upXqT2_pmpO_+Lg@mail.gmail.com> <6930807B-2FF0-4A5C-AD39-D05345C37A5E@chopps.org> <MW3PR11MB461955420610E933ACC44BC4C1C60@MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMHoTbDzZrA1ttPsdD5Tk7TADaR=ex5WGF=6+X3X1utoHg@mail.gmail.com> <bd193457-956c-47b0-a50b-8d1778e8349a@Spark> <CAOj+MMGuRHVoJ3ez4nQ3O87J4U+-+yabYWeA1AEfj1UGAbPp7w@mail.gmail.com> <3DFEBF57-427E-425E-B5D2-48F683519D16@chopps.org> <4764_1585908857_5E870C79_4764_208_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48E0BE48@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <4764_1585908857_5E870C79_4764_208_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48E0BE48@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 12:22:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMEiCpxEMd4=rm6zk=DewMWW87o7yWhAbov7wBkWiqqy7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, wangyali <wangyali11@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dd176d05a2604cb4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/L44N9rIaRzBb8sGzgHejGLhYfiE>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] problem joining interim [Re: A new version of I-D, draft-liu-lsr-isis-ifit-node-capability-02]
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:22:59 -0000

Ahh for the record I used that URL yesterday:

An email from the IESG secretary was sent on 2020-03-19, saying
"Information about remote participation: https://ietf.webex.com/meet/lsr "

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:14 PM <bruno.decraene@orange.com> wrote:

> Chris,
>
> Please see inline.
>
>
> > From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
> > Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 12:00 AM
> > To: Robert Raszuk
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Apr 2, 2020, at 5:17 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > Many thx,
> > > R.
> > >
> > > PS. As we are talking LSR here it is strange that joining virtual LSR
> meeting is not for everyone. I was waiting and tried three times today for
> host approval to join which was not granted.
> > >
> >
> > I am very sorry to hear this! We had 64 participants, at least at one
> point that I saw. I set the meeting up, and I don't believe there is any
> way to exclude anyone in particular, I certainly would never have chosen to
> do that.
> >
> > However, Webex has a password requirement when setting up meetings (I
> guess, I tried to not have one, it wouldn't let me) which we included in
> all the details wherever the details were posted, it was "linkstate".
> >
> > I did notice an email, from webex, during the meeting about a request
> from Bruno to join as guest, but he was in the participant list when I then
> checked.
> >
>
> So may be my experience may help for next time(s). See below.
>
> An email from the IESG secretary was sent on 2020-03-19, saying
> "Information about remote participation: https://ietf.webex.com/meet/lsr "
> Hence I used that URL.
> On this webex, the meeting did not start on time so I've waited for some
> time. Then 10-15 minutes past the start, I decided to 'notify the host',
> but never got accepted on the webex.
> At that point I assumed a technical issue with webex and monitored the
> mailing list, but no one was complaining, which is not inline with typical
> IETF reaction ;-) .
> So I assumed the error was only on my side and I searched for more emails
> and found one from Chris (2020-03-31) saying that the URL was
> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=mbef20efa9e66c7e97f9d6b18ea84eca8
> And this one worked fine.
> My guess is that the 'interim' webex did not use the 'lsr' webex. Also the
> 'official' notification from the IESG secretary with the incorrect webex
> URL did not helped.
>
> --Bruno
>
> > I didn't receive any other emails like that (and FWIW I had 5 windows
> over 2 monitors going at once trying to manage all this, so noticing the 1
> email was lucky).
> >
> > Did it let you skip entering a password (or did it not offer the option
> in the first place)?
> >
> > It would be good to figure this out before the next interim.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chris.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lsr mailing list
> > Lsr@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
> delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>